- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Your western beauty standards resulted from fetishizing tuberculosis
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:02 pm
LINK
quote:
Marie Duplessis, French courtesan and Parisian celebrity, was a striking Victorian beauty. In her best-known portrait, by Édouard Viénot, her glossy black hair frames a beautiful, oval face with sparkling eyes and ivory skin. But Duplessis’ fame was short-lived. Like Violetta, the protagonist in Giuseppe Verdi’s opera La Traviata whose tale Duplessis inspired, Duplessis was afflicted with tuberculosis, which killed her in 1847 at the age of 23.
By the mid-1800s, tuberculosis had reached epidemic levels in Europe and the United States. The disease, now known to be infectious, attacks the lungs and damages other organs. Before the advent of antibiotics, its victims slowly wasted away, becoming pale and thin before finally dying of what was then known as consumption.
The Victorians romanticized the disease and the effects it caused in the gradual build to death. For decades, many beauty standards emulated or highlighted these effects. And as scientists gained greater understanding of the disease and how it was spread, the disease continued to keep its hold on fashion.
“Between 1780 and 1850, there is an increasing aestheticization of tuberculosis that becomes entwined with feminine beauty,” says Carolyn Day, an assistant professor of history at Furman University in South Carolina and author of the forthcoming book Consumptive Chic: A History of Fashion, Beauty and Disease, which explores how tuberculosis impacted early 19th century British fashion and perceptions of beauty.
During that time, consumption was thought to be caused by hereditary susceptibility and miasmas, or “bad airs,” in the environment. Among the upper class, one of the ways people judged a woman’s predisposition to tuberculosis was by her attractiveness, Days says. “That’s because tuberculosis enhances those things that are already established as beautiful in women,” she explains, such as the thinness and pale skin that result from weight loss and the lack of appetite caused by the disease.
The 1909 book Tuberculosis: A Treatise by American Authors on Its Etiology, Pathology, Frequency, Semeiology, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Prevention, and Treatment confirms this notion, with the authors noting: “A considerable number of patients have, and have had for years previous to their sickness, a delicate, transparent skin, as well as fine, silky hair.” Sparkling or dilated eyes, rosy cheeks and red lips were also common in tuberculosis patients—characteristics now known to be caused by frequent low-grade fever.
“We also begin to see elements in fashion that either highlight symptoms of the disease or physically emulate the illness,” Day says. The height of this so-called consumptive chic came in the mid-1800s, when fashionable pointed corsets showed off low, waifish waists and voluminous skirts further emphasized women’s narrow middles. Middle- and upper-class women also attempted to emulate the consumptive appearance by using makeup to lighten their skin, redden their lips and color their cheeks pink.
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:08 pm to Jim Rockford
It resulted from our brains being wired to pick up traits that hint at the woman's potential fertility.
There is a bust/waist/hip ratio that our minds find attractive because that ratio also advertises fertility...typically young and healthy.
But yeah...the Western Patriarchy is fetishizing sickness.
There is a bust/waist/hip ratio that our minds find attractive because that ratio also advertises fertility...typically young and healthy.
But yeah...the Western Patriarchy is fetishizing sickness.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:16 pm to upgrayedd
Beat me to it....opened this thread just to post a Doc Holiday gif
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:17 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Beat me to it....

Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:18 pm to Jim Rockford
I go by that beauty standard where if you're a little chonky, it means you're rich enough to eat all the snacks and don't have to do any unnecessary moving around.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:27 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:Fast forward to 2020, where the world is shutting down over a virus with a 99.5% survival rate that predominately affects old and fat people.
By the mid-1800s, tuberculosis had reached epidemic levels in Europe and the United States. The disease, now known to be infectious, attacks the lungs and damages other organs. Before the advent of antibiotics, its victims slowly wasted away, becoming pale and thin before finally dying of what was then known as consumption.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:27 pm to Jim Rockford
I've seen a lot of TB patients. I don't recall thinking any of them represented a standard of outward beauty.
Popular
Back to top
