Started By
Message

City of St. George - good or bad for the long term future of GBR area?

Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:04 pm
Posted by TigerFan244
Member since Jan 2012
2594 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:04 pm
Mayor SWB looking like deer in headlights trying to figure out where funding is going to come from to run the city that used to be Baton Rouge.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 2:07 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26568 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:06 pm to
If coupled with a subsequent school district, it will be a positive for the area.

Usable public schools and functional government that actually provides public services would be a great way to stop the outflow of young middle class families.

I honestly don't even know what any negative impacts would be.
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
2758 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:06 pm to
Good.


Next Question.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423181 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:06 pm to
I was talking to steve meve about this earlier. It could end up being bad, by creating a huge black hole in bee-arr-uh.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36125 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:20 pm to
It can be good provided it’s done right,

We are supposed to be a capitalist society, if SG builds a better city and provides better services then it will be better than what we have now.

It would be even better if good folk in BR recognized the improvements and began to change themselves.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 3:01 pm
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7269 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:24 pm to
Good.

BR was living an unsustainable lie by supplementing their budget with funds from outside the city. This should make them self examine and spend funds where appropriate. CATS and COA should be first in line.
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
10355 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:28 pm to
Good. Forces BR to make changes to how they run things or else they may lose even more.
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
5372 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:29 pm to
Seems like if you police the shite out of it. Keep it safe and the riff-raff down or locked away. Keep the tax dollars local and do good things with it, you can have possibly the best city in the state.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14563 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:29 pm to
The only loss in tax revenue to the EBR budget is from the 2% sales tax, right? Current EBR budget is $1.2 billion; I think they can make work.

I wonder if an increase in property values over time can make up some of that difference.
Posted by ike221
Loo A Vul
Member since Aug 2006
13703 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:


I was talking to steve meve about this earlier. It could end up being bad, by creating a huge black hole in bee-arr-uh.


By additional white flight ?

Brain Drain?

Loss of tax revenue ?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423181 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

I honestly don't even know what any negative impacts would be.

Basically this would frick the city of BR 6-ways to Sunday and create a black hole that drags all the bordering areas down.

In theory.

I'm pro-STG.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
1344 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:32 pm to
It will be a great thing. High median income will make for a good school system, good policing, and potential for new business that want to be in the area, but don’t like BR politics. It may even be good for BR with the politicians now having to worry about losing high tax payers. I may be giving BR politicians too much credit though.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423181 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

By additional white flight ?

Brain Drain?

Loss of tax revenue ?

BR becoming a more amplified shithole than it is, removing economy and opportunity that funds the outer-lying areas like STG.
Posted by Pu2kph0
Member since Oct 2022
1113 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Mayor SWB looking like deer in headlights trying to figure out where funding is going to come from to run the city that used to be Baton Rouge.


She and her ilk are the ones to blame.. they take, take, take like there is no end to the free money. Sooner or later, the people who are paying the taxes get sick and tired of carrying the freeloaders who produce nothing but consume everything.

They are no better than locust.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Seems like if you police the shite out of it. Keep it safe and the riff-raff down or locked away.


I'm hoping the very first thing St. George does is put a moratorium on new apartment complex construction.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26568 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:39 pm to
If the city of BR had its house in order, that would not be a concern...
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14563 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

BR was living an unsustainable lie by supplementing their budget with funds from outside the city. This should make them self examine and spend funds where appropriate. CATS and COA should be first in line.
According to the list of parish wide millages;

St. George residents don't pay for CATS, that's funded by Baton Rouge and Baker property taxes and federal grants, not the general fund. It was renewed last year so that's not going away anytime soon.

COA is funded by a parish wide property tax and grants, so their funding won't be affected by St. George incorporation either.

Unless I'm completely wrong about this (always a possibility) St. George incorporation won't do shite to cut funds from the bloated budgets of CATS, BREC, COA, etc. (departments/organizations with a dedicated funding souce.) The cuts will have to come from this list (general fund expenditures).

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68122 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:47 pm to
People like some structure.

Decently run cities where property rights are protected and the basics are handled (roads, sewer, fire, police) at a reasonable cost. It should be a meritocracy and be no place for social experiments.

Build it and they will come.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423181 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

If the city of BR had its house in order, that would not be a concern...

I agree. It doesn't and things could spiral.

Again, I'm pro-STG, just answering the question.

This is like the Nola/Northshore discussions on the same topic. If Nola implodes, the NS is fricked
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48328 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

According to the list of parish wide millages;

St. George residents don't pay for CATS, that's funded by Baton Rouge and Baker property taxes and federal grants, not the general fund. It was renewed last year so that's not going away anytime soon.

COA is funded by a parish wide property tax and grants, so their funding won't be affected by St. George incorporation either.


Unless I'm completely wrong about this (always a possibility) St. George incorporation won't do shite to cut funds from the bloated budgets of CATS, BREC, COA, etc. (departments/organizations with a dedicated funding souce.) The cuts will have to come from this list (general fund expenditures).


BR City has been siphoning around $50 million annually in tax revenue from the unincorporated areas to help fund BRPD and BRFD. That lost revenue is going to have to be made up somewhere - potentially by cutting nonessential programs like CATS.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram