- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dave Rubin having a kid
Posted on 3/19/22 at 5:53 am
Posted on 3/19/22 at 5:53 am
I heard Dave Rubin and his husband will be having a surrogate child. I'm generally a fan of Rubin and like his show, and I don't care if he wants to live a gay lifestyle. But the surrogate child thing, specifically for gay couples is immoral. It strips a child away from his mother, so two dudes can play mommy. If you want to live a homosexual lifestyle, then fine, but you need to understand that you can't ask the chocolate factory to make your kids.
15
Posted on 3/19/22 at 5:59 am to burger bearcat
quote:
dudes can play mommy
Libs are pushing men to take over everything. Who would have thought.
Posted on 3/19/22 at 6:11 am to burger bearcat
quote:wrong, kemosabi. it's still sin and thus evil.
If you want to live a homosexual lifestyle, then fine
Posted on 3/19/22 at 6:20 am to arcalades
quote:
wrong, kemosabi. it's still sin and thus evil.
Not promoting the lifestyle. But don't care if gays want to do their thing by themselves, we are all sinners. This changes when they bring a child into the picture, especially through the practice of surrogacy. It's one thing if they are adopting (which I'm still agaisnt), but surrogacy and removing the mother is pretty evil.
This post was edited on 3/19/22 at 6:21 am
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:35 am to burger bearcat
Because all of the straight folks divorcing and forcing children to spend one weekend with mom and the other with dad is a good thing?
I love how selective morality is on this board when it comes to gay folks.
I’m gay and don’t fall in line with the alphabet soup movement, but Dave and his husband can provide a much more stable and loving environment than two 19 year olds who choose not to use protection on a one night stand and get married “for the kid.”
Get over yourself and focus on the red letters in that book you claim to follow.
I love how selective morality is on this board when it comes to gay folks.
I’m gay and don’t fall in line with the alphabet soup movement, but Dave and his husband can provide a much more stable and loving environment than two 19 year olds who choose not to use protection on a one night stand and get married “for the kid.”
Get over yourself and focus on the red letters in that book you claim to follow.
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:38 am to bluestem75
I watch that guy all the time and had no idea he was gay. Makes me like him even more.
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:39 am to bluestem75
quote:
Because all of the straight folks divorcing and forcing children to spend one weekend with mom and the other with dad is a good thing?
I love how selective morality is on this board when it comes to gay folks.
I’m gay and don’t fall in line with the alphabet soup movement, but Dave and his husband can provide a much more stable and loving environment than two 19 year olds who choose not to use protection on a one night stand and get married “for the kid.”
Get over yourself and focus on the red letters in that book you claim to follow.
I agree that divorce is wrong. But the key difference that you need to see while divorce is wrong repentance of the sin and correction is possible. Living in sin and refusing to repent of the sin is the key difference. I sin all the time, I ask for forgiveness and hopefully do not reengage with that sin. God Bless you all the same man.
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:45 am to bluestem75
quote:
Because all of the straight folks divorcing and forcing children to spend one weekend with mom and the other with dad is a good thing?
20 bucks says the OP is also against divorces for convenience...
quote:
...but Dave and his husband can provide a much more stable and loving environment than two 19 year olds who choose not to use protection on a one night stand and get married “for the kid.”
True. It'd be interesting to see education levels, incarceration rates, etc. of children raised by gay couples compared to the general pop.
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:46 am to burger bearcat
quote:
surrogate child thing, specifically for gay couples is immoral
Y’all always pick the dumbest crosses to die on
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:49 am to Azkiger
I am against divorces of convenience. Marriage should mean something, not just be disposable.
When it comes to gay marriage it has to be allowed (rights issue). As a Christian though I want the churches to be protected and the government not being the enforcement arm of the movement. Freedom of Religion has to mean something.
When it comes to gay marriage it has to be allowed (rights issue). As a Christian though I want the churches to be protected and the government not being the enforcement arm of the movement. Freedom of Religion has to mean something.
This post was edited on 3/19/22 at 8:51 am
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:54 am to aubie101
quote:
and the government not being the enforcement arm of the movement.
Oh, I agree 100%. I'm not religious but I understand your concerns. This "just bake the cake bigot" and all these pushes to kill religious institutions (churches, charity, schools, etc) that don't go along with the LGBTQAIP7,=? or trans activists is one of the larger political issues of our time.
The first amendment must stand in its entirety or we're screwed.
This post was edited on 3/19/22 at 8:55 am
Posted on 3/19/22 at 8:55 am to bluestem75
quote:
I’m gay and don’t fall in line with the alphabet soup movement, but Dave and his husband can provide a much more stable and loving environment than two 19 year olds who choose not to use protection on a one night stand and get married “for the kid.”
EDIT: I misread. My apologies.
I’m 100% ok with gays adopting and of course it’s most likely a net positive for society when kids are adopted. While I have some concerns and biblical opinions about homosexuality in general, but I’m betting that the outcome for a kid adopted by anybody straight or gay has a 99% better outcome than the opposite.
It’s not a hill I’m going to die on, but not really an advocate for surrogacy for homosexual couples. I’m not going to rage or be angry about Rubin doing it, but I’d rather adoption be the first choice.
This post was edited on 3/19/22 at 8:57 am
Posted on 3/19/22 at 9:04 am to burger bearcat
Not that long ago they told us they just wanted tolerance and to be able to have their partner visit them in the hospital.
Slippery slope wins again.
Slippery slope wins again.
Posted on 3/19/22 at 9:07 am to bluestem75
quote:
Because all of the straight folks divorcing and forcing children to spend one weekend with mom and the other with dad is a good thing?
Those are their kids! Lol
Posted on 3/19/22 at 9:09 am to burger bearcat
Yeah, there's a growing split between the anti-woke movement and the Christian conservative movement (new wave, not really Christian Coalition type)
Primarily because of stuff like this
Primarily because of stuff like this
Posted on 3/19/22 at 9:10 am to bluestem75
quote:
I’m gay and don’t fall in line with the alphabet soup movement, but Dave and his husband can provide a much more stable and loving environment than two 19 year olds who choose not to use protection on a one night stand and get married “for the kid.”
There is a difference between gay adoption and gay guys essentially building a child (or two) by paying women
Posted on 3/19/22 at 9:11 am to tiger1014
quote:
Y’all always pick the dumbest crosses to die on
The concept of the family and the idea that two guys shouldn't build a child for $$$ to fulfill their desire for normalcy is a quite reasonable cross to die on
Posted on 3/19/22 at 9:40 am to Pettifogger
quote:
The concept of the family and the idea that two guys shouldn't build a child for $$$ to fulfill their desire for normalcy is a quite reasonable cross to die on
Lol
Posted on 3/19/22 at 10:49 am to bluestem75
quote:
focus on the red letters
Jesus Christ is the Word that became flesh, so why not focus on the entirety of the Word of God? He is the same yesterday, today, forever. His will doesn't bend to man's.
Posted on 3/19/22 at 10:56 am to burger bearcat
How do y'all feel about this situation creating/nurturing a child from birth to believe a marital relationship or set of parents should be two men?
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News