- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge Boasberg’s daughter works for USAID funded Partners For Justice
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:33 pm
They don’t even try to hide their corruption.
quote:
Chief Judge Boasberg Blocked the deportation of Tren de Aragua gang member’s without disclosing the fact that his daughter works for a 501c3 called “Partners For Justice” that gives criminal illegal aliens and gang members legal advice. I have exclusively uncovered a massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST involving Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Boasberg recently made the decision to prevent the deportation of criminal illegal alien gang members on planes out of the country.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXPOSED
The Judge has a daughter named Katherine Boasberg, who works for a 501(c)(3) organization called Partners for Justice @PFJ_USA as a “capacity building associate". In her position, she helps coordinate and administer grant activities, ensuring compliance, and supporting the delivery of capacity-building programs to strengthen nonprofit infrastructure. Katherine Boasberg also has pronouns in her bio. She goes by SHE/HER, proving her affiliation with the Left. The Judge’s daughter focuses on criminal defense and advocacy as an employee of Partners For Justice. Partners for Justice is an organization that derives 76% of its funding from GOVERNMENT GRANTS!
From the Partners For Justice website: “Our Impact: “Supporting those in need, transforming the system. Partners for Justice is transforming public defenders into a robust network of dynamic, people-centered service centers to reduce incarceration, increase equity, and positively impact the lives of those harmed by cycles of incarceration, poor health, and poverty. Since 2018 they have connected thousands of people with stabilizing services and eliminated an estimated 5,000 years of jail and prison time, compared to maximum exposure.” Partners for Justice strongly opposes mass deportations and legislation targeting members of criminal gangs, and has been a vocal critic of the Laken Riley Act. In a screenshot below, Emily Galvin-Almanza @GalvinAlmanza, the founder of “Partners for Justice” tweeted an article about Judge Boasberg blocking @realDonaldTrump’s deportations of Venezuelan gang bangers. She employs the Judge’s daughter.
Such a close familial relationship brings into question how the judge may render decisions and how his decisions may impact the professional career of his daughter, who’s employment is based upon defending criminal illegal aliens, gang members, and opposing mass deportations. It seems that Judge Boasberg has a clear conflict of interest & is obligated to recuse himself from this case, as outlined in the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which specifies the circumstances under which a judge must disqualify themselves from a proceeding.
The disqualification clause states the following: “A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances in which: The judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is: Known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.” The mass deportation of criminal illegal aliens and gang members could lead to a substantial reduction in urban crime rates, potentially decreasing the caseload for Partners for Justice, while also reducing gang-related incidents that may, in turn, diminish funding opportunities for Partners For Justice from U.S. government grants and private foundations. Judge Boasberg MUST RECUSE HIMSELF!
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:39 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Elon about to give Loomer a raise. If she keeps this up she might become another one of his baby momma's 

Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:45 pm to LSUAngelHere1
§ 2.32 Interfering with agency functions.
(a) The following are prohibited:
(1) Interference. Threatening, resisting, intimidating, or intentionally interfering with a government employee or agent engaged in an official duty, or on account of the performance of an official duty.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:55 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Isn’t that something. Just like Merchan and his daughter
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:56 pm to Revelator
Why I am just shocked beyond belief!
Posted on 3/17/25 at 11:57 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Whole families involved in these grifts.
These scum are incapable of cutting it in the private sector.
These scum are incapable of cutting it in the private sector.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:38 am to Privateer 2007
Talk , Talk , Talk everyone is a crook , a scammer , cheating the government a dirt bag . Show me the proof in black and white walk the walk
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:39 am to LSUAngelHere1
Katharine, I think this is the correct spelling.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:41 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
Talk , Talk , Talk everyone is a crook , a scammer , cheating the government a dirt bag . Show me the proof in black and white walk the walk
The team
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:49 am to LSUAngelHere1
Not what I was expecting.



quote:
Katherine Boasberg

Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:51 am to LSUAngelHere1
Just because you say that it is corruption doesn’t make it so.
That’s just an inference of impropriety, or guilt by association. Who wrote the OP?
This sounds like a rough draft of a HS paper that hasn’t been graded yet. It would be redlined to hell by any competent teacher due to the unsubstantiated claims being made.
You have to show your work to make a compelling argument. Otherwise, it’s just slinging accusations across the room with nothing. Kind of like all those “Release the Kraken” court cases.
You have to explain how having a daughter who works for a US Agency is corruption. Were there unfair hiring practices?
You already know that USAID had thousands of legitimate employees doing legitimate jobs. If you don’t know that, then educate yourself. Hopefully you don’t think that receiving US grants are evidence of a crime. That’s their purpose. You have to show that it was improper. Just think - wouldn’t Elon be in big shite then if receiving US money was a problem?
Because implying that all employees of US Agency like USAID is evidence of corruption isn’t going to pass the smell test.
That’s just an inference of impropriety, or guilt by association. Who wrote the OP?
This sounds like a rough draft of a HS paper that hasn’t been graded yet. It would be redlined to hell by any competent teacher due to the unsubstantiated claims being made.
You have to show your work to make a compelling argument. Otherwise, it’s just slinging accusations across the room with nothing. Kind of like all those “Release the Kraken” court cases.
You have to explain how having a daughter who works for a US Agency is corruption. Were there unfair hiring practices?
You already know that USAID had thousands of legitimate employees doing legitimate jobs. If you don’t know that, then educate yourself. Hopefully you don’t think that receiving US grants are evidence of a crime. That’s their purpose. You have to show that it was improper. Just think - wouldn’t Elon be in big shite then if receiving US money was a problem?
Because implying that all employees of US Agency like USAID is evidence of corruption isn’t going to pass the smell test.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 1:58 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:08 am to AGGIES
quote:
You have to explain how having a daughter who works for a US Agency is corruption
You a little slow?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:19 am to AGGIES
quote:
Just because you say that it is corruption doesn’t make it so.
That’s just an inference of impropriety, or guilt by association. Who wrote the OP?
You have to show your work to make a compelling argument.
The standard is "impartiality might reasonably be questioned" not "corruption." It should be clear how the judges daughter who works to protect illegal gang members from deportation might cause his impartiality to be questioned when the case deals with illegal gang members facing deportation.
quote:
The disqualification clause states the following: “A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:42 am to TenWheelsForJesus
Look at their website. Partners for Justice supports public defenders offices around the country.
Our constitution guarantees the right to have the assistance of Counsel for their defense. It is the 6th Amendment.
Miranda rights also explicitly state that right upon arrest.
We don’t just demonize defense attorneys…powerful lawyers for the rich or public defenders for the poor… just because a judge ruled against Trump.
Our constitution guarantees the right to have the assistance of Counsel for their defense. It is the 6th Amendment.
Miranda rights also explicitly state that right upon arrest.
We don’t just demonize defense attorneys…powerful lawyers for the rich or public defenders for the poor… just because a judge ruled against Trump.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:46 am to LSUAngelHere1
I used to go to Patriot Medic's (or whatever his channel name was) youtube channel during the Q years and listen to the insanity. However, one thing brought forward by Q and the Q followers was incredibly salient - the enormous number of marriages in DC between judges, media, policy makers etc and their family members. It's a giant pool of conflicts. There's simply no credibility in anything that comes out of DC.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:49 am to AGGIES
quote:
We don’t just demonize defense attorneys…powerful lawyers for the rich or public defenders for the poor… just because a judge ruled against Trump.
Boasberg is garbage. He's always been garbage. Trump went after USAID and this piece of garbage has a daughter dependent on USAID money. That's a conflict. These conflicts are all over DC and spread throughout the federal judiciary. The law profession likes to preach about ethics, but they don't really do anything about ethics. Except violate them.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:53 am to POTUS2024
quote:
I used to go to Patriot Medic's (or whatever his channel name was) youtube channel during the Q years and listen to the insanity.
This explains your position much more clearly than facts or logic.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 3:04 am to AGGIES
quote:
This explains your position much more clearly than facts or logic.
Stellar argument.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 5:09 am to AGGIES
Assuming this is true you don't find it odd a judge agrees to block the deportation of illegal criminals and the judges daughter just hapens to work for a government funded group that gives legal help to illegal criminals in the US????????
GTFO
GTFO
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 5:32 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 5:17 am to WhiteMandingo
quote:
Assuming this is true you don't find it odd a judge arees to block the deportation of illegal criminals and the judges daughter just hapens to work for a government funded group that gives legal help to illegal criminals in the US????????
Same people that believed biden was healthy. Same people that believed Russia and every other lie....
They'll believe anything a democrat tells them. Naive idiots.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 5:19 am
Popular
Back to top
