- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
SoonerK
Favorite team: | Oklahoma |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 942 |
Registered on: | 11/17/2021 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: OU wins bidding war for DT Damonic Williams; Oklahoma selling government bonds to finance.
Posted by SoonerK on 5/3/24 at 4:23 pm
[quote]We took Cayden Green from you. And OU fans responded by harassing his father's business. Mizzou responded by driving up the price for a DT from TCU. Mizzou is still ahead, in cost-effective talent and fan restraint.[/quote]
Want to take a guess of where Missouri finished amongst the four tea...
re: OU wins bidding war for DT Damonic Williams; Oklahoma selling government bonds to finance.
Posted by SoonerK on 5/3/24 at 3:48 pm
[quote]Correct. Oklahoma just spent $2 million on a freaking DT. Word on the street is that Mizzou and LSU purposely ran it up.
Sounds like OU's NIL might just be wrecked at this point. It really wasn't much to begin with.[/quote]
I can assure you that the deal was nowhere near $2 million....
re: Scientists reveal the face of a Neanderthal who lived 75,000 years ago
Posted by SoonerK on 5/2/24 at 2:06 pm
[quote]How do they know she was a woman?[/quote]
Sequencing of proteins inside the tooth enamel....
re: Scientists reveal the face of a Neanderthal who lived 75,000 years ago
Posted by SoonerK on 5/2/24 at 12:11 pm
[quote]The depictions are political in nature, and reflect current thing unfortunately.[/quote]
Please explain....
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted by SoonerK on 4/30/24 at 9:42 am
[quote]Why hasn't the Hubble telescope taken a picture of the flag on the moon? The only photo we have is from 1969 lmao. Humans have never set foot on the moon and you have to be an idiot to think we did.[/quote]
The highest resolution that Hubble can achieve is about 0.03 arcseconds using its A...
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted by SoonerK on 4/26/24 at 10:13 pm
[quote]That's my biggest question.
One poster tried, props to him for giving it a go. But no one has provided an explanation that makes logical sense as to why no other country has gone to the moon in the last 54 years.
There's a bunch of reasons why it would be beneficial to do so, so why hav...
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted by SoonerK on 4/26/24 at 11:35 am
His first point was that shadows always run parallel, which they clearly do not in photography as the picture I posted shows. ...
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted by SoonerK on 4/26/24 at 11:23 am
[quote]You are the one who believes Neil A. (Alien spelled backwards) rode on a rocket ship to the Moon[/quote]
Checkmate...
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted by SoonerK on 4/26/24 at 11:17 am
[quote]When two objects are next to each other and the sun is behind them casting the same amount of sunlight, you would expect for the shadows to be parallel to each other and not one being at a 90 degree angle. Just one of the observations made from one of the photos from the moon landing.[/quote]...
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted by SoonerK on 4/26/24 at 10:38 am
[quote]I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Are you saying shadows run parallel to each other? When has this ever been the case? Do you not know what a vanishing point is?
You people are fricking stupid. I’m sorry you’re like this. It’s not your fault.[/quote]
It is their fault....
re: SCOTUS isn’t going to mess with immunity
Posted by SoonerK on 4/25/24 at 5:54 pm
[quote]But that does not apply in this case because Trump is not a sitting President, he is a former President - so impeachment has nothing to do with whether he can be criminally charged with anything.
But it does apply. Trump was in office and he was acquitted by the Senate on the charge of ins...
re: Stuck in jury duty
Posted by SoonerK on 4/18/24 at 8:42 am
Served as a jury foreman last year for case where the charges were 2 counts of 1st degree murder and 2 counts of attempted murder....
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 10:46 pm
[quote]Actually and factually, you are the one wrong.
LINK
168 million eligible and registered to vote. Of those, 154 million voted. Never in the history of the USA has 92% of registered voters actually voted.[/quote]
So you are either not reading anything else I have written in the thread ...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 8:25 pm
Those numbers do not add up.
US Population = 330 million
US <18y Pop = 73 million
US prison and parole ineligible = 4 million
US immigrants = 45 million
The US vote eligible population (330 - 73 - 4 - 45) = 208 million
2020 Census:
US citizen voting age population = 231.5 million
US pris...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:42 pm
[quote]No one gives a flip about your "guess." Especially after you stuck to methods double or triple counting nearly every voter who moved out of state in the past 5yrs.[/quote]
Oh enlightened one, what is your number of registered voters in 2020?...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:41 pm
[quote]And you been shown that method significantly overestimates eligible registered voters. That fact you're still touting it is telling.[/quote]
It could be overstating by 5% which can be expected as registrations are not a static data point....
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:38 pm
[quote]That is not my understanding at all. The USCB estimates registered voters regularly, not just in census years.
They employ a combination of methods data sources and statistical models including voter registration data and demographics, population projections and registration rates, surveys...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:34 pm
[quote]I would hope the EAVS does not use surveys to collect data like the Census does? Hopefully, they use hard data from the states and not surveys? 209m out of a possible 239m were registered to vote! That means 86% of all voting aged people were registered? That seems awfully high. That includes...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:10 pm
[quote]Those 168m numbers are pulled from the 2020 Census of people that responded to that question they were registered. What is missing is the 37.5m people that did not answer that question. How many of those 37.5m people are registered voters?
168m + 37.5 doesn’t get you to 209 million. That’s...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 4:59 pm
[quote]This info looks more accurate for 2020:[/quote]
Those 168m numbers are pulled from the 2020 Census of people that responded to that question they were registered. What is missing is the 37.5m people that did not answer that question. How many of those 37.5m people are registered voters?...
Popular