Started By
Message

Expiration of “Trump” tax cuts

Posted on 5/3/24 at 5:52 am
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14237 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 5:52 am
So I saw on the news that although dipshit promised not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $400k if they let the current tax brackets expire then a couple with 3 kids making $200k will pay an additional $7k in taxes.

Does that sound right? That’s not a small amount.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72841 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:08 am to
it is democrats period. they love raising taxes.
Posted by SulphursFinest
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
8747 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:45 am to
Where would you pay the extra $7k. As far as I know it’s the same, and the News is feeding you misinformation
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71267 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Where would you pay the extra $7k


We'd go back to the previous tax rates. The current child tax credick would be cut in half. The current standard deduction would be cut in half. The marginal rate would go from 22% to 25%.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85097 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:11 am to
Sounds in the ballpark. Trump tax cuts sunsetting so soon was a terrible idea when it happened.

It repealed the personal exemption forever but the standard deduction and child tax credit was a finite period. So dumb.

ETA - I stand corrected on personal exemptions. They would return in 2026.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 2:07 pm
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1581 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:32 am to
Technically Biden wouldn't be doing anything to make that happen so he could honestly - with the support of MSM - deny he did this. He could still blame Trump and the republicans. That's how they shove this shite down our throats... Well, we better let grandpa get what he wants or my taxes are going to go up by 7k a year. DV's are considered UV's for this post...
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68365 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

We'd go back to the previous tax rates. The current child tax credick would be cut in half. The current standard deduction would be cut in half. The marginal rate would go from 22% to 25%.



To expand on this even more specifically.

The Trump Tax cuts took the 15% bracket to 12%, the 25% bracket to 22%, the 28% bracket to 24%, 33% bracket to 32% and 39.6% bracket to 37%

So for middle/lower upper income people especially it was a huge break, going from 25 to 22 and 28 to 24 especially. When you throw in the standard deduction increase as well, a GIGANTIC break for people who made very little as well.

At the time, one of the biggest tax breaks overall in our history. Got billed by 1 side as a tax break for all, and another side really just a tax break mostly for the high income earners...but he didnt touch the 35% bracket and 33% only went to 32% which isnt much. If he didnt touch the 39.6% bracket it really could have never been pinned as a tax cut for the rich. Was still smart to cut the tax brackets where he did because literally everyone felt that when it went into effect, and if that got thrown back to prior tax brackets under the Dem control they might not win another election for a long time for the simple fact how many people would see their paychecks get smaller basically overnight once the new year hit.

The standard deduction doubling was pretty huge too. Most singificantly for the lower income earners. Think about someone who made $30k in 2017 with a $12,700 deduction vs. someone who made $30k in 2018 with a $24k deduction. Ton of money back in their pocket.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 9:19 am
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10267 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:08 am to
The is liberals lying 101.

“We’re not going to raise your taxes… but those temporary tax breaks orange man gave you are not going to be extended”.

They should have been made permanent revisions so we don’t have to play these games. At least Trump has some ammunition here. Pocket book reason to get him back in.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14237 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:34 am to
So my follow up question is where are our esteemed Republican congressmen pushing a bill to make this permanent?

God I hate politicians.
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:36 am to
quote:

It repealed the personal exemption forever but the standard deduction and child tax credit was a finite period. So dumb.


He should've made the individual rate cuts permanent and the corp rates temporary instead of the other way around.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10267 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:43 am to
quote:

So my follow up question is where are our esteemed Republican congressmen pushing a bill to make this permanent? God I hate politicians.


But then they would have a reason for us to “need” them either. The scumbaggery is played on both sides.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68365 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:44 am to
quote:

So my follow up question is where are our esteemed Republican congressmen pushing a bill to make this permanent?



It would be a complete waste of time never getting signed by a democrat president even if it got by a democrat controlled senate which is highly unlikely.

They would never sign something that prominent that Trump did into law especially how much they framed it as just a tax cut for the rich which is the big hold up on their end. Like I said, if they never touched that top bracket they would have nothing to really complain about.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14237 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:48 am to
Realistically no….but they could make a big damn deal about the tax increase coming from the Dems because they refuse to consider it….and will be coming if they win…..which in an election season seems as much of a no brainer as there ever was.

Posted by Sterling Archer
Austin
Member since Aug 2012
7328 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:59 am to
muh trickle down economics
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80789 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Where would you pay the extra $7k. As far as I know it’s the same, and the News is feeding you misinformation

Rates revert to pre-Trump tax cuts. Results in increase in taxes for everyone making $22,000 (married) or higher. I believe this is beginning 2026 so if Biden is re-elected.

This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 11:16 am
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
34021 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 11:32 am to
Taxes will go up with the sunset and they can blame trump
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14237 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 11:45 am to
So given this does it ever make sense to direct 100% of a company 401k into the tax deferred plan vs the Roth if it can drop you into the lower bracket?

I’ve always been of the mindset it’s better to pay today’s rates when I have an income vs some unknown future rate 10 years from now when I need to live off my saved funds.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2134 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:16 pm to
According to the IRS site the personal exemption was only suspended and returns in 2026.
IRS.
Found same on a tax planning site. The estate tax exemption will also revert back to $5m.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 12:55 pm
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2134 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

So given this does it ever make sense to direct 100% of a company 401k into the tax deferred plan vs the Roth

Sure, if you are in a high marginal bracket now you should consider the effective tax rate (not the marginal bracket) of future withdrawals. If you dont expect significant income from other sources during retirement, much if not all of your traditional withdrawals will be taxed at zero (standard or itemized deductions) and then the bottom brackets before any of it gets taxed in a bracket equal or greater than your current one. You are doing it wrong if simply comparing rate in your top bracket today and future.

Even better, if you are withdrawing a mix of traditional, Roth and taxable (including basis) to optimize brackets. It's typically best to pull a portion from traditional so you can use that to fill the standard deduction and possibly the bottom brackets then top off w taxable basis or Roth when you approach higher brackets.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 1:28 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85097 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

According to the IRS site the personal exemption was only suspended and returns in 2026.


Ah, you’re correct. Good catch.

SALT cap would be removed, but QBI would go too.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram