Started By
Message

re: Let's say you make the Trae/Center move...is trading CJ a "must"?

Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:16 am to
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:16 am to
Also let's not forget what this thread was originally asking. Essentially, the thought process is giving up CJ and BI while asking Trae to cover that production. That's as impossible ask.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9140 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Trae has shot the Hawks into games... he's also shot them out of games.


I mean you can say this about any NBA star. He takes a lot of 3s, hits big shots- isn’t this what we been begging for offensively next to Zion? Again defensively understand the concerns; offensively seems like exactly what we need next to Zion.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9140 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Essentially, the thought process is giving up CJ and BI while asking Trae to cover that production. That's as impossible ask.


You’re assuming we wouldn’t get a productive player/players back for CJ though.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:19 am to
quote:

He takes a lot of 3s,


And hits at career 35% clip. That's not good for someone that takes a lot of threes and the exact opposite of what we need with Zion. We need a #2 who has shown he can play off ball and be ready to catch and shoot. The idea is point-Zion right?
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:20 am to
quote:

You’re assuming we wouldn’t get a productive player/players back for CJ though.


I don't think we will if we trade him in the offseason. If we wait until the deadline and trade him to a contender looking for a vet scorer, then maybe, but then that means we are selling at the deadline, which is what we're trying not to do.

We're in a really shitty spot.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9140 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:22 am to
quote:

And hits at career 35% clip. That's not good for someone that takes a lot of threes and the exact opposite of what we need with Zion.


Ok come on man, we both know he’s a deadly 3 pt shooter. Defenses shift their whole defensive coverage because of him.

I don’t know why people think its a bad thing to have two players who can intiate the offense? Several teams have this- just look at the Mavericks.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:

we both know he’s a deadly 3 pt shooter


He's definitely not deadly.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424128 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:27 am to
quote:

we both know he’s a deadly 3 pt shooter.

I don't know this
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424128 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:28 am to
quote:

I don’t know why people think its a bad thing to have two players who can intiate the offense?

Because with Trae, there is only one player who can initiate the offense
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25866 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Also let's not forget what this thread was originally asking. Essentially, the thought process is giving up CJ and BI while asking Trae to cover that production. That's as impossible ask.



You also need to remember that the point of giving them both up, is so that Trey can start.
You aren't asking Trae to fill CJ and BI's absence. You're asking Trae and Trey to fill their absence, and I like the Trae/Trey better. I also expect Hawkins to take Trey's 3 point role off the bench.

If BI nets you Trae, and CJ nets you Jarrett Allen, we are a significantly better team.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25866 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:38 am to
You guys do know that Trae shot 38% from 3 this year?
and he is pretty regularly around 38% on C&S 3's for his career.

It's the dumb pull up 3's that drag his average down at times.



He does only shoot 35% from 3 in the 4th quarter for most of his career.

You know who's shot over 40% from 3 in the 4th quarter the last 2 years. Coby White.
There aren't many guys who shoot near or over 40% from 3 in the 4th that are asked to create their own shots.
Trey Murphy has, but Trey is taking C&S 3's.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:48 am to
quote:

It's the dumb pull up 3's that drag his average down at times.



And you think he's just going to stop doing that?
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25866 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:58 am to
quote:

And you think he's just going to stop doing that?




He must of done that enough this year considering his pull up 3 % is higher this past year than it usually is.
I'll admit i don't watch Trae often enough to know what's making the difference, but he's always been a great C&S 3 point shooter.
Last 5 years:
38.9% C&S (2.0 attempts) - 37.3% Pull ups (6 attempts)
37% C&S (1.3 attempts) - 32.7% Pull ups (5 attempts)
48.1% C&S (1.0 attempts) - 37% Pull ups (6.9 attempts)
37.3% C&S (1.3 attempts) - 33.5% Pull ups (4.9 attempts)
46.6% C&S (1.7 attempts) - 33.5% Pull ups (7.7 attempts)

The 2nd and 4th lines there are the years he shot under 36% from 3 overall, the other 3 years are over 36%.
He's also never played with someone as dominant as Zion. He might be a lot more accepting of taking more C&S 3's with Zion on the court b/c he respects him as a great player more than he does anyone else he's played with.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

He's also never played with someone as dominant as Zion. He might be a lot more accepting of taking more C&S 3's with Zion on the court b/c he respects him as a great player more than he does anyone else he's played with.


I just don't see how a dude who has been the guy everywhere he has been since high school will suddenly be ok being relegated to #2. This isn't 2K, it will take at least one season and some of a second season for that to work. And it's not a given that it ever will.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9140 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

This isn't 2K, it will take at least one season and some of a second season for that to work. And it's not a given that it ever will.


Yeah but this applies to most stars coming in to play with Zion. It will take time. And nothing is ever a given. I mean can you name me a star these things wouldn’t be an issue with?
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I mean can you name me a star these things wouldn’t be an issue with?


Yeah, but the endgame is a higher upside with other stars or other good players.

A career ball-dominant player is a terrible pair with Zion.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111199 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

I just don't see how a dude who has been the guy everywhere he has been since high school will suddenly be ok being relegated to #2. This isn't 2K
That's not something that has never happened before though. We've seen this.
quote:

it will take at least one season and some of a second season for that to work.
Same would go for any other good player that isn't Trae. Plus, I don't see the path where we make enough moves to be a legit title contender next season, so if it takes 1 year to then maximize the team, that's fine.
quote:

And it's not a given that it ever will.
True

I think being a small market team you have to swing for the fences and get the best guy possible if you can. Sure, it's the "hope for the best" strategy, but again, if we don't get the best player, we're kind of doing the same thing...hoping for the best with a team we know is just not good enough.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25866 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

I just don't see how a dude who has been the guy everywhere he has been since high school will suddenly be ok being relegated to #2


At some point they realize they can't win it by themselves and they need help.
This isn't a you're #1 and you're #2. It's we are both #1's and we'll play to win the fricking game, same thing Luka and Kyrie are doing.

When Zion is playing like he did against the Lakers in the game he got hurt, it's not hard to recognize that you keep playing through him. That won't happen every game. Some games Trae will be unstoppable and Zion will let him do his thing late in games. Them figuring that out is the challenge, and if they actually want to win, then it'll work itself out naturally.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71432 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:15 pm to
I'd also argue that Trae Young is more of a star in name than in production.

He was a huge name coming out of college and has the highlight gene where he can hit the Curry-range 3's, so that gives him some clout in the highlight packages on TV and social media... but unlike prime Curry, there are inefficiencies in his 3pt game. He's shown that he's not a #1 on a contender and, while we have no idea if he can be a #2 on a contender, his current tendencies say probably not.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111199 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Yeah, but the endgame is a higher upside with other stars or other good players.

Nah

Trae is the high risk/high reward play

Garland/Murray are the safer bets. Less likely that it crashes and burns spectacularly, but not the upside of Trae.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 12:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram