- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/14/24 at 6:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
You had to get an early start back then because you would probably be dead by 45.
Posted on 4/14/24 at 10:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Social conservatives: we need to go back to our sexual standards of the past
1864 age of consent: O rly?
Social conservatives: NOT THAT FAR BACK. NOOOOO
Sorry, finding an ancient law doesn't make it ok for you to be diddling kids.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:That's how it was in 1864. Social conservatives: we need to go back to our sexual standards of the past 1864 age of consent: O rly? Social conservatives: NOT THAT FAR BACK. NOOOOO
You realize life expectancy in the U.S. in in 1864 was 39. Essentially half of what it is today.
You basically had to start having kids in your mid teens in those days to have a realistic good chance of raising them to adulthood.
To act like that wasn’t a different time and place in 1864 is disingenuous-also nobody is saying it was “better” back then. Life in general in 1864 had a “plethora” of vicious factors that made life absolutely brutal compared to what we consider good quality of life today.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News