- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MOP asks state SC to rehear St George case
Posted on 4/30/24 at 5:02 pm to SFVtiger
Posted on 4/30/24 at 5:02 pm to SFVtiger
quote:
rehearing is reargument . retrial is new evidence. don't need anything for the former, the latter has rules about new evidence and whether it's new/admissible
MOP is saying she screwed up and wants a do over.
0
Posted on 4/30/24 at 5:19 pm to In The Know
She represents Cole. State SC literally told Cole he has no standing. Not sure what argument she thinks she can make which will override her client not having standing.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 5:30 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
StG just isn’t into you anymore.
Well played, well played indeed.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 5:30 pm to Bard
quote:
She represents Cole. State SC literally told Cole he has no standing. Not sure what argument she thinks she can make which will override her client not having standing.
He will move again into St George to have standing, yet still keep his metro council seat,
Posted on 4/30/24 at 5:33 pm to Brummy
quote:
I didn't realize you could just ask for a do-over without some new information coming to light.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:01 pm to Cliff Booth
quote:
said. “If you want your money back, well, give us our assets back.”
come dig up the roads and plumbing They’re acting like this is the first town/city to ever incorporate in a parish.
This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:06 pm to Icansee4miles
quote:
Lipsey and Enquist and others must be grifting some serious dollars to keep underwriting this wild goose chase
Do these guys live in St. George or BR? What’s stopping them from moving themselves and their business incorporations to the city of their choosing if they are so upset about what’s going on?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:15 pm to Hickok
Lipsey lives in StG and his business may be illegally annexed into BR.
Not sure where Engquist lives but his business model is based on building in unincorporated EBR and calling it BR.
They see their businesses suffering due to either BR being less powerful or StG able to regulate the area I. Question.
Not sure where Engquist lives but his business model is based on building in unincorporated EBR and calling it BR.
They see their businesses suffering due to either BR being less powerful or StG able to regulate the area I. Question.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:15 pm to In The Know
St. George should secede from EBR and start its own parish
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:16 pm to CoachChappy
They can use the Central case as precedent for how this is handled.
Cue one of their lawyers yelling that no one gives a shite about Central.
Cue one of their lawyers yelling that no one gives a shite about Central.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:22 pm to In The Know
All this posturing and smell of desperation tells me there are some irregularities that may come to light from this separation. No proof, just a feeling.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:26 pm to Chrome
They never thought they would lose, hence they didn’t bother to cover their asses on anything fricky they did.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:27 pm to teke184
quote:
Lipsey lives in StG and his business may be illegally annexed into BR.
Lipsey shouldn't be mad. North BR will still be 68% of his customer base.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:30 pm to LSUTigerFan247
“Customer base”?
How much shrinkage of his inventory is due to that area’s residents?
How much shrinkage of his inventory is due to that area’s residents?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:33 pm to teke184
quote:
How much shrinkage of his inventory is due to that area’s residents?
Bro its illegal to steal firearms
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:34 pm to LSUTigerFan247
It’s illegal to do a lot of things but BRPD turns a blind eye to it and claims crime is down.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:37 pm to teke184
quote:
They never thought they would lose, hence they didn’t bother to cover their asses on anything fricky they did.
Kind of where I'm at too.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:41 pm to Chrome
My understanding is that they were legally obligated to not only put that tax money into escrow but to draw up budgets based on whether the vote passed or failed for incorporation.
They didn’t put the money into escrow and I doubt they budgeted accordingly because, if they did, those numbers could be subpoenaed for the case by the StG side.
Showing that BR got X in revenue from St George and spent virtually $0 in services on it would have been a killer for their case.
They didn’t put the money into escrow and I doubt they budgeted accordingly because, if they did, those numbers could be subpoenaed for the case by the StG side.
Showing that BR got X in revenue from St George and spent virtually $0 in services on it would have been a killer for their case.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 6:59 pm to Bard
quote:
She represents Cole. State SC literally told Cole he has no standing. Not sure what argument she thinks she can make which will override her client not having standing.
This X 1,000. Who is she trying to fool here? The SC said not only does St George won on the merits, the case shouldn’t have gotten to them in the first place because Cole doesn’t have standing. I predict they laugh at her request for a rehearing.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:54 pm to Icansee4miles
Engquist won't get another subdivision approved in STG for 1000 years. You hate to see it.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News