Started By
Message

re: The metric system is indeed superior

Posted on 6/24/19 at 12:53 pm to
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14533 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 12:53 pm to
The stonecutters have been keeping it down for decades.
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12125 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

How fuel would I save if I was doing 137 Km per hour?

Not as much as doing 160 kph.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17070 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 1:33 pm to
I believe it was France that switched to a decimal clock after the French revolution in 1793. It didn't last long.

A decimal clock uses 10's, just like metric. So 10 hours in a day, 100 minutes in an hour, and 100 seconds in a minute.

Also I prefer Fahrenheit over Celsius. F is more precise than Celsius.
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
17683 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 1:39 pm to
Yeah, I posted this in a previous thread, but Fahrenheit is much better in terms of weather.
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
30616 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 1:44 pm to
I ran a superior statistical analysis and my data shows the metric system to be inferior.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19342 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 1:55 pm to
I had to fire a guy a few months back because he swore up and down he couldn't find a 12 inch scale (ruler for you non machinists) in the shop. He said they all stop at 11 and was sure some of the guys were fricking with him.he swore up and down they had scales that were marked at the 12th inch while he was in school. He was found out to be a complete liar.
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
20385 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 2:03 pm to


I think MAGA is a better slogan.
Posted by bakersman
Shreveport
Member since Apr 2011
5723 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 3:40 pm to
I’m really disappointed that I need my metric tools to change the oil on my Silverado. A Chevy!! It’s goddamn America why is Chevy using the metric system
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6103 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 3:53 pm to
There was a push in the 1970s to switch to metric but it quietly faded away. Too much of a hassle. It’s basically like learning a new language- For at least the first generation everything will have to be translated back into pounds and miles for it to make any sense.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22218 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 3:56 pm to
I don't get it. Rulers do have a 12" mark.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37624 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 3:56 pm to
I want to rail on how stupid people are that they can’t understand the metric system and how easy it is to use, and I’d be 100% correct in doing it.

Except in my head, everything I heard a term described in metric units I’d have to convert it to imperial units so I could gauge the magnitude. So I won’t call everyone stupid.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37624 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 3:57 pm to
Apparently scales don’t
Posted by td1
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
2844 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 4:01 pm to
I work on a lot of old small engines as a hobby. When measuring tolerances / calculating tolerances it is so much easier to calculate without a calculator using metric (when they list the specs in imperial and metric). I hate the fractions in the imperial system.

ie. 100mm = 3.937 inches or 3 15/16
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
20385 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 4:26 pm to
Recall the multi-million dollar mistake in 1999 when engineers failed to convert from metric to English

Mars Probe Lost

quote:


NASA lost its $125-million Mars Climate Orbiter because spacecraft engineers failed to convert from English to metric measurements when exchanging vital data before the craft was launched, space agency officials said Thursday.

A navigation team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory used the metric system of millimeters and meters in its calculations, while Lockheed Martin Astronautics in Denver, which designed and built the spacecraft, provided crucial acceleration data in the English system of inches, feet and pounds.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34880 posts
Posted on 6/24/19 at 4:50 pm to
Glazed Donuts per bald eagle?

I prefer furlongs per fortnight.
Posted by Helo
Orlando
Member since Nov 2004
4596 posts
Posted on 9/2/19 at 8:04 am to
When is the last time you saw Barometric pressure stated in inches?

I know they started posting dual pressures at least in the 80s but for the past 10 years or so I can't remember seeing anything except for millibars.

It takes time but eventually you adjust to a different method of measurement.

1086 mb (32.08 inches of mercury): Highest Ever Recorded
1030 mb (30.42 inches of mercury): Strong High Pressure System
1013 mb (29.92 inches of mercury): Average Sea Level Pressure
1000 mb (29.54 inches of mercury): Typical Low Pressure System
980 mb (28.95 inches of mercury): CAT 1 Hurricane or a very intense mid-latitude cyclone
950 mb (28.06 inches of mercury): CAT 3 Hurricane
870 mb (25.70 inches of mercury): Lowest Ever Recorded (not including tornadoes)
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 8:25 am
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 9/2/19 at 8:20 am to
quote:

The metric system may seem superior but it is man made. I'd rather stick with the natural way even if it's a little tougher.



No it is not.

The metric system uses constants that work in the universe...

English system is manmade.
This post was edited on 9/2/19 at 8:21 am
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 9/2/19 at 8:33 am to
The number ten has no special significance other than being the number of fingers most people have. Standard measurements are just fine.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47959 posts
Posted on 9/2/19 at 8:42 am to
quote:

But here’s the thing, I find it so difficult to abstractly understand the magnitude of something when told to me in metric system units. 15 km? 42 C? 150 kg?

bc we haven't grown up with it... If you have you understand those measurements well
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/2/19 at 8:47 am to
quote:

There was a push in the 1970s to switch to metric but it quietly faded away. Too much of a hassle. It’s basically like learning a new language- For at least the first generation everything will have to be translated back into pounds and miles for it to make any sense.



I remember the 113 meter postings down foul lines.

150 meter home run doesn't have the same ring as 480 ft or whatever the actual conversion is.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram