I haven't seen 2000 Mules yet

Just watch it!

Any well done documentary will be convincing.
That is its purpose.

Everyone watching ANY documentary should always keep in mind that it is biased and intended to be.

Haven't watched either, but reading the True The Vote presentation is all that is needed to understand what they did and just how extensive and organized the fraud industry was.

That is if 81 million votes for Biden wasn't enough!

I am one of those people you described too.

It is convincing, but ill briefly lay out some of its issues.

1) It is much more convincing to a person that understands the technical portions of the geolocation technology. Although the group used ridiculous conditions for their classifications of a mule, it is too easily dismissed by a don lemon type, with "they wanna say an election was stolen because somebody drove by a library," or something similar, to be effective enough to get the necessary public support, which you'll regularly see termed as "normie."

2) The side accused of stealing the election effectively controls mainstream media. This makes everything difficult.

3) The group made grandeur claims about releasing the evidence, leading many to believe we would see tons of videos of things like the same mule visiting 23 boxes or have immediate release of the identity of the ngos and those involved in those entities. However, the wind was taken from the sails, which is a very effective way to make people give up over time.

In reality though, one of the main reasons we don't have the videos is because something seemed to miraculously happen to make the videos unavailable. Where it was available? We have have mules going to multiple drop boxes.

don lemon just says, "you want to turn over the will of the people - brown people...women...lgbthdkshrvdh gods - because somebody drove by a library and dropped off LEGAL ballots; fraud may have happened some, but there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud; give me a break," and the majority of the population doesn't think twice.

You should watch it.

quote:

---

You’re worried you will believe it, so you’re avoiding it?

---

No, I'm worried about paying to see it only to see bullshite spewed by obviously biased people. I want to see evidence that leaves me sitting there saying "I have no alternative explanation for that". I just want to make sure it's worth paying for and not be like watching Sean Hannity.

If you watch it, and then do 10 minutes of your own research, you will realize all the "fact checkers" that debunk it are (as usual) completely full of shite

quote:

---

Once you're aware of the information, you become responsible for it.

---

Whew.

Well said.

It's pretty cut and dry. Their argument examines geolocation data farmed from people's phones and data mining techniques to correlate unique phone ID's to geofenced areas and times. From there they can backtrack the identity of the anonymized phone data by geofencing areas like ballot drop boxes and they found that repeat visitors were dumping large amounts of ballots. They have it all on tape because they also know the exact time of the visitors.
The cringiest part was having Charlie Kirk and PragerU have a powwow talking about the impact of this finding and blubbering as part of the film...
The question now remains, what will be done about it and will they make the dataset/report public for us to analyze?

just check bitchute theres probably a copy

quote:

---

1) It is much more convincing to a person that understands the technical portions of the geolocation technology. Although the group used ridiculous conditions for their classifications of a mule, it is too easily dismissed by a don lemon type, with "they wanna say an election was stolen because somebody drove by a library," or something similar, to be effective enough to get the necessary public support, which you'll regularly see termed as "normie."

---

I think this is one of the problems with those that are somewhat reasonable on the left. They can't comprehend the magnitude of the steal so they dismiss it because they don't understand it.