- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
JUCO years will no longer count towards NCAA eligibility
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:01 am
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:01 am
Due to the Diego Pavia ruling, kids can now play 2 years of Juco ball and still have 4 years of NCAA eligibility.
The NCAA just keeps losing on everything and the NIL/transfer stuff is getting out of hand. Based on the other cases that have gone against the NCAA, I imagine this one will eventually stick as well. Some of these kids are going to start making a living just being a college athlete.
I wonder what type of impact this will have on NCAA sports?
LINK
The NCAA just keeps losing on everything and the NIL/transfer stuff is getting out of hand. Based on the other cases that have gone against the NCAA, I imagine this one will eventually stick as well. Some of these kids are going to start making a living just being a college athlete.
I wonder what type of impact this will have on NCAA sports?
LINK
quote:
While not a binding ruling, Judge Campbell does not disagree. He wrote Wednesday that the NCAA's argument for counting junior college years toward an athlete's eligibility clock "falls flat."
quote:
Just as a court ruling ended the NCAA's ability to enforce its transfer rules, and a separate ruling ended the NCAA's ability to enforce its NIL policy, the Pavia case could end the NCAA's ability to enforce its eligibility rules. If Pavia can return in 2025, why not 2026? And if Pavia can play two years for a 2-year school and four more for a 4-year school, why not everyone else? And if that's the case, how can the NCAA enforce its eligibility rules on anyone at all?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:02 am to YMCA
quote:
JUCO years will no longer count towards NCAA eligibility
quote:
not a binding ruling
Maybe let's see how it plays out before making definitive statements.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:02 am to YMCA
That article is wrong. The ruling only applies to Pavia.
Edit. The article isn't wrong. Your assumption that it applies to others is wrong.
Edit. The article isn't wrong. Your assumption that it applies to others is wrong.
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 10:04 am
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:03 am to YMCA
EJ Kuale you have 2 years of eligibility my son.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:05 am to YMCA
Pavia’s whole argument is that he wasn’t eligible for NIL in JUCO.
Aren’t they eligible now?
Aren’t they eligible now?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:08 am to S
Jerrell Powe may finally learn to read
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:13 am to BigBinBR
quote:
That article is wrong. The ruling only applies to Pavia.
Another player will challenge it, if the NCAA doesn’t fight it, it will be universally applied.
While this ruling does specifically apply to only Pavia, the flood gates are open and the NCAA can’t do anything to stop it.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:14 am to BigBinBR
quote:
That article is wrong. The ruling only applies to Pavia.
While I agree this is currently geared towards Pavia, it seems like all of the rulings that applied to a single/handful of players ended up being for all athletes bc people will continue to fight against it and use this as the reason they should have the same opportunity(if this ruling goes through).
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:16 am to Dire Wolf
Mett has an extra year. 2026 look out.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:16 am to YMCA
Won't be long before eligibility will be a thing of the past and you can play as long as you're enrolled
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:41 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
Pavia’s whole argument is that he wasn’t eligible for NIL in JUCO.
Pavia’s argument is definitive proof that the value of NIL is with the universities, not the players.
He doesn’t need to be at an ncaa member school to get sponsored by anyone at any time for any reason.
But he is suing to be allowed to remain at an ncaa member school, because that will generate him more sponsorship opportunities than he is able to generate on his own.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:49 am to YMCA
quote:
Judge Campbell does not disagree. He wrote Wednesday that the NCAA's argument for counting junior college years toward an athlete's eligibility clock "falls flat."
It's collegiate eligibility....JUCO is college....this judge is an imbecile.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:53 am to YMCA
quote:
JUCO years will no longer count towards NCAA eligibility
People are gonna believe this even tho OP just made an incorrect headline.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:58 am to Olric
quote:
Won't be long before eligibility will be a thing of the past and you can play as long as you're enrolled
How long until someone is an NFL bust and then goes back to play in college?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 10:58 am to YMCA
Need an age limit on college ball
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:01 am to WaterLink
quote:
How long until someone is an NFL bust and then goes back to play in college?
Not terribly long, maybe within the next 5 years. Given how the courts have been ruling, I don’t see how they will stop this going forward, barring a structural overhaul of the entire system.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:06 am to sunnydaze
quote:
Need an age limit on college ball
BYU enters the chat.

This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 11:07 am
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:27 am to Olric
Republican judges strike again in the destruction of college sports
Posted on 12/19/24 at 11:28 am to YMCA
it was only a preliminary injunction, not the final ruling
Popular
Back to top
