- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
EEOC rolls out new rule that punishes employers for using "wrong" pronouns
Posted on 4/30/24 at 7:55 am
Posted on 4/30/24 at 7:55 am
quote:
In landmark guidance, the federal commission created to fight racial and sexual discrimination declared Monday that employers that fail to use a worker's preferred pronoun or refuse them the chance to use the restroom of their choice will be engaging in prohibited harassment.
Feds warn employers can be punished for failing to use preferred transgender pronouns, restrooms
14
Posted on 4/30/24 at 7:58 am to TrueTiger
If you can change your gender every day why not your pronouns?
Show me the money!
Show me the money!
Posted on 4/30/24 at 7:59 am to TrueTiger
All of that is unconstitutional. It's compelled speech and creating a special class of people that can pick and choose where to go drop their trousers at the expense of others and their privacy.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 7:59 am to TrueTiger
quote:
EEOC rolls out new rule that punishes employers for using "wrong" pronouns
I just call everyone, Stupid.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:00 am to TrueTiger
Looks like employers will just hire around this problem 
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:00 am to TrueTiger
quote:
EEOC
One of the more useless of the Federal Agencies / Commissions... Should be done away with in its entirety... Would like to know what the EEOC costs businesses each year...
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:03 am to TrueTiger
Lmao…good thing the Supreme Court decided to reduce the threshold to “some harm” to file a discrimination lawsuit
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:04 am to TrueTiger
Ok. Let’s get serious about this. It’s high time we require separate bathrooms, for each gender- worldwide. Clothing manufacturers need to step it up- as currently there are only “men” and “women” options for clothing. Sports? Well of course. We need a separate league for each of growing number of genders as well.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:05 am to The Maj
quote:
One of the more useless of the Federal Agencies / Commissions... Should be done away with in its entirety... Would like to know what the EEOC costs businesses each year...
Your average BS EEOC claim costs $10-15k, and even more if the claimant has the slightest leg to stand on.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:08 am to TrueTiger
Just dont hire people who want their pronouns displayed.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:10 am to TrueTiger
This is quite literally the federal government attempting to squelch free speech on the topic of gender dysmorphia by threatening reprisals for not using speech the federal government agrees with.
I can't wait to see the first test of this.
I can't wait to see the first test of this.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:11 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Just dont hire people who want their pronouns displayed
Exactly why I trash every resume that declares pronouns.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:23 am to TrueTiger
Someone who works there should show up every day with a different 'gender' and list of pronouns - and go ballistic if not immediately enforced throughout the workplace - maybe even change in after-noon.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 8:33 am to TrueTiger
Why not just sh1t in any room you deem to by "your restroom "? In the middle of a meeting with a table full of coworkers, just step to the corner of the room and do your business like it's normal.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 9:22 am to TrueTiger
quote:
guidance
Guidance contains the force of law? From an unelected fed agency?
quote:
declared Monday that employers that fail to use a worker's preferred pronoun or refuse them the chance to use the restroom of their choice will be engaging in prohibited harassment.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 2:19 pm to Herschal
quote:
Guidance contains the force of law? From an unelected fed agency?
If you don't think that official guidance does not become the reasonable standard in disputes, you are hopelessly naive.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 3:01 pm to TrueTiger
I would say what I really think abiut this, and what should happen to the people that support and push this, but it's been nice not getting PMs all the time.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 3:10 pm to Herschal
I won't say it's worthless or deny that it can serve as a roadmap to eventual policy/precedent, but EEOC guidance gets a lot less reverence than other agency guidance.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 3:12 pm to TrueTiger
How long until we need a dolphin compliant restroom because Gerald Broslofsky, the lawfin, sues over it?
Posted on 4/30/24 at 3:15 pm to Pettifogger
Either Scotland or Ireland just learned how difficult it is to enforce this nonsense. All it took was having every threatened person turn in a complaint for investigation. Backlog rose from 45 complaints to 105600 in a weeks time.
Use the system
Use the system
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News