- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:06 pm to Timeoday
Once again, zero evidence, not even videos shot through a potato
This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:08 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
Once again, zero evidence, not even videos shot through a potato
They weren't there to present evidence. They were making a call for the POTUS to waive whistleblowers NDAs and offer them legal protection to come forward. The comments about the different alien species came during a brief Q&A at the end of the presser.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:10 pm to AlterEd
OP
quote:
Multiple congressional members are saying this as well
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:13 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:If there are ETs then they would have to be “close” enough to find us logistically, out of 100 billion stars in the galaxy.
the universe is just way too big.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:14 pm to LSUBanker
quote:
If they're here, then I like to know how they did it? Warp 9?
What specifically makes you think another civilization couldn’t be far more advanced than us?
A little over 100-125 years ago whale oil was a commonly used product for lamps and lubrication, and the Wright brothers made their first flight.
We went to the moon the first time in my (and possibly your) lifetime.
Another civilization 1,000 years more advanced than ours may very possibly laugh at our understanding of physics, much like you’d laugh at elementary math attempted by tribesmen on North Sentinal Island.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:16 pm to AlterEd
quote:
It is an attempt to establish yourself as an authority in a transparent appeal to authority ploy.
I have never seen a more egregious example of a pot calling a kettle black in my entire almost 56 years of life.
That is all.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:20 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
If you saw something, by yourself, no pics or videos, but swore you saw it for more than a blink of an eye, would you trust you had seen something?
I have seen something, by myself, for more than the blink of an eye, no pics or video.
quote:
would you trust you had seen something?
Well, I saw something.
If you mean, would I trust that I had seen something other than an optical illusion, no.
I think the most likely explanation for what I saw is some kind of optical illusion. Next most likely IMO is some kind of secret government craft. After that I would say demonic activity. Last would be aliens from another galaxy.
And it would be a distant last.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:35 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
have never seen a more egregious example of a pot calling a kettle black in my entire almost 56 years of life
Nonsense. Quote one time I've attempted to establish myself an authority. You can't because you're a frickin liar.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:37 pm to AlterEd
4 out of 535. Sure, multiple. Wonder why he just didn’t say 4.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:39 pm to AUveritas
quote:
4 out of 535.
4 who sit on the taskforce tasked with doing this work. You double down on shitbag cynic. Reverse ad populum.
This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 6/11/26 at 4:44 pm to Timeoday
But not one clear picture?
Just one?
Just one?
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:04 pm to AlterEd
quote:quote:
have never seen a more egregious example of a pot calling a kettle black in my entire almost 56 years of life
Nonsense. Quote one time I've attempted to establish myself an authority. You can't because you're a frickin liar.

Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:29 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Bananas. There is not one shred of physical evidence that points to this. There are testimonies (almost always 2nd hand) and grainy, inconclusive videos that are most likely showing mundane objects that are present at the edge of whatever sensors detectability.
So you’re questioning the existence of UAP in general?
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:31 pm to tide06
quote:
So you’re questioning the existence of UAP in general?
No. That is established fact.
I’m questioning the fact that it is beyond reasonable doubt that they are being piloted by non-human intelligence.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:33 pm to tide06
quote:
So you’re questioning the existence of UAP in general?
UAP doesn’t stand for aliens in spaceships.
Unknown Aerial Phenomena.
Interesting they stopped calling it an object, don’t you think?
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:34 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
Interesting they stopped calling it an object, don’t you think?
It makes more sense if some of the "objects" are sentient plasmoids. It's a more inclusive and apt term.
Also, people think they changed the nomenclature in order to make it harder to acquire documents through FOIA.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:36 pm to AlterEd
quote:
They weren't there to present evidence. They were making a call for the POTUS to waive whistleblowers NDAs and offer them legal protection to come forward. The comments about the different alien species came during a brief Q&A at the end of the presser.
No, I meant ever in the history of the UFO industry.
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:38 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
No, I meant ever in the history of the UFO industry.
Oh, I see. You're retarded. Thanks for clarifying.
Popular
Back to top


1


