Started By
Message

re: Kansas Ban On Child Transgender Medicalization Fails To Beat Veto After Two GOP Flip

Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:21 am to
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64442 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:21 am to
I am 1000% against this grooming behavior of the left but the second guys logic at least on the surface seems like he’s giving the totality of the bill a lot of thought and feels like it needs to be refined and not jammed through causing unintended consequences later. Seems like he is anti surgery and anti hormone blocker from his statement.

I’m not going to pretend to know what this bill entails in its entirety and maybe it’s just a sound bite.

Hopefully they can pass one that is more veto proof.
This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 9:24 am
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19404 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:31 am to
quote:

The other Republican who voted against the bill, Borjon, said he “strongly supports” prohibiting gender reassignment surgery and “limiting” the use of hormone blockers, but that some parts of the bill “go too far in restricting mental and behavioral health care for children.”

The only restriction on mental and behavioral health care for children is that it bans state employees and state facilities from promoting "social transitioning" which is defined in the bill as "acts other than medical or surgical interventions that are undertaken for the purpose of presenting as a member of the opposite sex, including the changing of an individual's preferred pronouns or manner of dress."

From the bill: Section 2 (d) "Except to the extent required by the first amendment to the United States constitution, a state property, facility or building shall not be used to promote or advocate the use of social transitioning, medication or surgery as a treatment for a child whose perceived gender or perceived sex is inconsistent with such child's sex." and Section 2 (f) "A state employee whose official duties include the care of children shall not, while engaged in those official duties, provide or promote the use of social transitioning, medication, or surgery as a treatment for a child whose perceived gender or perceived sex is inconsistent with such child's sex."

LINK
Posted by Tasseo
Member since Feb 2024
895 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Kansas Ban On Child Transgender Medicalization Fails To Beat Veto After Two GOP Flip
quote:

VOR

Approval of this behavior really does make people like you evil. Pure evil diabolical anarchy eats your brain/heart. Get right with God.

"Neck tattoos for babies are between their parent and the licensed tattoo artist"
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109303 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:54 am to
quote:

From the comment they believe in leaving such serious decisions, short of surgery, to the parents and their doctors.


If the parents and doctors agreed to lobotomize the child, would you agree with that and say it was just their business? I thought the doctor’s oath was “Do No Harm.”

We’ve gone so fricking crazy that I now have to explain to people that mutilating and castrating children is evil.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109303 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:58 am to
quote:

ETA: Gender mutiliation of a child is abhorrent and any parent who forces that on their children - who have no legal right to consent or agree to anything until they turn 18 - should all be imprisoned.


There are some parents I’m sympathetic towards in this. These evil doctors will outright threaten their child and say “Would you rather have a trans daughter/trans son, or a dead son/daughter?” Some parents terrified that their child might die if they don’t “listen to the professionals” comply with what they’re “told by the experts.”

This goes both out to the evil doctors and the sympathetic terrified parents, first let’s establish the parameters if there were just as many trans kids per capita in the past as there are today? If the answer is “Yes” and you’re saying this is lifesaving treatment, then please point out the mass trans kid suicide epidemic in the 70s? …Oh you don’t have that? How about the 80s? …No? …90s? …2000s? Oh no data whatsoever to support your claim. It does however pop up in the 2010s, and I’m sure it’s not related to this map at all:

This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 10:06 am
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32607 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 10:09 am to
quote:

These decisions belong between the team of professionals and the parents. The youth need our help, not government overreach.


Now do cigarettes, alcohol, or compelled school.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11590 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 10:23 am to
Those two have certificates from the Mike Johnson Executive Course on Strong Conservative Leadership.
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6095 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Weak?


No. They are Democratic plants. They show their true colors when tough legislation comes up.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23296 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

and their doctors


These aren't doctors.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23296 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

medical decisions. Is that a conservative point of view?


It's not medicine so your entire insane rant is invalid.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34566 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

From the comment they believe in leaving such serious decisions, short of surgery, to the parents and their doctors.


The doctors making bank off of the surgery?

I roasted the ever living frick out of Hank when he posted something similar to your stupidity.

The data is EXTREMELY CLEAR, this coursecof action is harmful in the long term. By supporting these heinous acts…Im definitively of the opinion that you, Hank, and the medical butchers involved, are all in support of child abuse.

You do you though.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34566 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

There are some parents I’m sympathetic towards in this. These evil doctors will outright threaten their child and say “Would you rather have a trans daughter/trans son, or a dead son/daughter?”


This is why I didn’t mention the parents. While many are vile pieces of human excrement, some are simply having their emotions played upon.

The modern day leftists currently running the country are evil. Period…end of discussion.
Posted by Tammany Tom
Mandeville
Member since Jun 2004
3216 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Some of you really like the idea of government being involved in all sorts of individual medical decisions. Is that a conservative point of view?


Do you like the idea that a 13 year old girl should be able to have sex with a 45 year old man, if the parents consent to it???

If you have a problem with that (and you are a sick frick if you don’t have a problem with it) then you most certainly should have a problem with a 13 year old boy having his dick cut off, because his parents consented to it.
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
9825 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:51 pm to
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
16305 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:52 pm to
Doctors and parents should decide if little kids need transgender medical services?

I reject that belief. I'm not against parents teaching their children whatever they want, and instilling their own ideals into their children... but when it moves to actions, where some children are basically being sterilized without being old enough to contemplate and decide it for themselves, I'm against it.

Got to be 21 to buy cigs and beer. 18 to buy lottery tickets. 18 to vote. But when it comes to mutilation at the behest of parents.. there's no age limit?


It wouldn't be bad if all sides of the transgender argument were equally presented. But, the youth who transitioned and were negatively impacted...are often censored from speaking out about it. The vast majority of transgender stories and articles are positive, and portray going through the medical procedures as great. That one sided dialogue has led to many not understanding what they were getting into. Then when they are suffering post-transition, they are silenced...while the cookie cutter portrayals of transitioning being akin to rainbows and butterflies continue to flood across society, coaxing more and more people.
This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 2:59 pm
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
7182 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 3:55 pm to
Dovyou have children? Should your 14 year old be able to get a boob job or penis enlargement?

These aren't "life-saving" surgeries, they are elective procedures...
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
10868 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Weak?

From the comment they believe in leaving such serious decisions, short of surgery, to the parents and their doctors.

Some of you really like the idea of government being involved in all sorts of individual medical decisions. Is that a conservative point of view?


Jesus Christ. This board has really allowed some fricked up shite to spread around lately. Tarzana thinks 11 year old girls should be able to consent to sex and you think parents and doctors should take it upon themselves to just Josef Mengele their child in anyway they feel like. frick you and anybody who agrees with you
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18023 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

OMLandshark


Well Damn Howdy! Lookee what the cat dragged in!

My favorite Bill Maher loving pop-culturologist ! You were missed — don’t let the peanut gallery tell you different!



Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37436 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Some of you really like the idea of government being involved in all sorts of individual medical decisions. Is that a conservative point of view?



Because the idea that conservatives want government out of everything is a low IQ conservative idea. And it's not true. It's just a reaction to the ongoing overregulation proposed by Liberals.

So let's put that to bed and talk about letting doctors mutilate children with the agreement of parents - because that's what this is. How do you feel about that idea instead? Let's have that discussion instead of fake ones.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45407 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Why are republicans so weak?


It’s who they are.

They’re not fighters.

They’re timid, scared.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram