- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
BI has 1 3PA in the first 2 games combined
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:52 pm
That is a mind blowing stat. Your starting small forward and one of your best shooters just straight up refusing to shoot 3s.
2
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:54 pm to Balsamic_duck
The supposed best 3 point shooter in the league this year is 3-14 through two games.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:54 pm to Balsamic_duck
He routinely passes up a semi-open catch and shoot 3 for a contested pull-up 2. It’s maddening.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:55 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
The supposed best 3 point shooter in the league this year is 3-14 through two games.
And?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:58 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:The guy with the best % in the league has a lower 3pt% than CJ the last 2 games.
The supposed best 3 point shooter in the league this year is 3-14 through two games.
Does that mean he can't be the best 3pt shooter either now?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:00 pm to shel311
Just reminding you all that CJ is playing shittier than BI, on both ends of the court.
B/c he isn’t a legit #2.
But let’s just ignore how crappy he is and just shite on BI.
And I still want to trade BI.
B/c he isn’t a legit #2.
But let’s just ignore how crappy he is and just shite on BI.
And I still want to trade BI.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:01 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:Neither is BI, so I still don't see the relevance of repeating that.
B/c he isn’t a legit #2.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:04 pm to shel311
B/c you think he is. And I keep telling you isn’t.
We can’t trade our supposed #2 for a fricking non shooting big.
We can’t win without a #2. BI goes out, a better #2 has to come back.
We can’t trade our supposed #2 for a fricking non shooting big.
We can’t win without a #2. BI goes out, a better #2 has to come back.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:04 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Just reminding you all that CJ is playing shittier than BI, on both ends of the court. B/c he isn’t a legit #2. But let’s just ignore how crappy he is and just shite on BI. And I still want to trade BI.
Honestly they both sucked dude.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:06 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:I think who is what? Not sure what you're talking about.
B/c you think he is
quote:You seem confused
And I keep telling you isn’t.
I've made it abundantly clear that your argument that we'd lose a #2 in BI is irrelevant because of 2 reasons:
1. BI isn't a #2
2. CJ can be a #2 just like BI can, poorly
quote:We can if he's not a #2, just like CJ isn't a #2.
We can’t trade our supposed #2 for a fricking non shooting big.
quote:BI isn't a #2, so we don't lose a #2 by trading him.
We can’t win without a #2. BI goes out, a better #2 has to come back.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:07 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
We can’t trade our supposed #2 for a fricking non shooting big. We can’t win without a #2. BI goes out, a better #2 has to come back.
No, you bring back someone who is less skilled in a vacuum but fits better with Zion/Trey/Herb.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:09 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
We can’t trade our supposed #2 for a fricking non shooting big. We can’t win without a #2. BI goes out, a better #2 has to come back.
BI isn’t a #2 and neither is CJ
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:09 pm to Pels_Yaz
BI was a good bit better offensively than CJ today, and he still wasn’t good.
CJ has been bad these two games, and his defense is so bad. I’ll run the numbers tomorrow morning but I have a feeling they’ll be uglier than game 1.
It also points out why we can’t trade BI for a PG that can’t play D b/c CJ is bad enough. You can’t pair him with another bad small defender.
CJ has been bad these two games, and his defense is so bad. I’ll run the numbers tomorrow morning but I have a feeling they’ll be uglier than game 1.
It also points out why we can’t trade BI for a PG that can’t play D b/c CJ is bad enough. You can’t pair him with another bad small defender.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:11 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
BI was a good bit better offensively than CJ today, and he still wasn’t good.
Because Willie was specifically forcing plays to get BI going. We were down by 13 at half when BI started getting going we went down 20 which makes you wonder how effective he really was offensively.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:12 pm to shel311
Cool. So your solution is to simply not have a #2?
That’ll work out real well.
Arguing that BI isn’t a #2 is irrelevant.
Thinking we shouldn’t be looking for a #2 in a trade is unbelievably stupid.
We have assets coming out of our arse still. Be aggressive and go get a guy that makes us a contender.
That’ll work out real well.
Arguing that BI isn’t a #2 is irrelevant.
Thinking we shouldn’t be looking for a #2 in a trade is unbelievably stupid.
We have assets coming out of our arse still. Be aggressive and go get a guy that makes us a contender.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:16 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:I'll repeat what I said in the other thread. There is no realistic path to adding a legit #2 on a championship level team. That does not mean we should keep BI because, again, he is not a #2.
Cool. So your solution is to simply not have a #2?
That’ll work out real well.
quote:It's the crux of the entire thing that shows your point about CJ to not be relevant, not sure how you don't see that.
Arguing that BI isn’t a #2 is irrelevant.
quote:Never said we shouldn't look for one, not sure what you're talking about.
Thinking we shouldn’t be looking for a #2 in a trade is unbelievably stupid.
Seems the difference is you think BI can bring back one of those #2 on a title team guys that would have a legit shot of us landing him. I think that's not realistic, at all.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:16 pm to TeddyPadillac
What #2 is available?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:18 pm to ghost2most
quote:And that we can realistically trade for...
What #2 is available?
For example, Donovan Mitchell... Not realistic, we're not giving it all up for a 1 year rental, nor should we.
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 11:19 pm
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:28 pm to shel311
Tyler fricking Herro looks likes more of a playoff #2 than BI or CJ ever has. And he’s done it multiple times.
Lauri is the guy we should be going after.
DeMar DeRozan would be an upgrade over BI.
They’ll be guys available in the offseason you didnt think would be. We have assets to get anyone.
Lauri is the guy we should be going after.
DeMar DeRozan would be an upgrade over BI.
They’ll be guys available in the offseason you didnt think would be. We have assets to get anyone.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:29 pm to TeddyPadillac
Tyler Herro is not a #2
I'm all for Lauri, I'd bet that's not realistic. Why would Ainge move him for Brandon Ingram?
I'm all for Lauri, I'd bet that's not realistic. Why would Ainge move him for Brandon Ingram?
quote:Upgrade, yes. Not a #2.
DeMar DeRozan would be an upgrade over BI.
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News