Started By
Message

re: The dumbest company?

Posted on 1/21/16 at 9:43 am to
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17159 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Blockbuster got conned into a deal with Enron. Enron made them believe that they had the infrastructure in place to deliver streaming video on demand over the internet. Not only did Enron not have the capacity, they DIDN'T EVEN HAVE A BROADBAND NETWORK.


Forbes Article in 2000

WOW!!! Reading this article today provides SO MUCH Monday morning quarterbacking opportunities...

quote:

Both companies expect to generate significant revenue. The in-home entertainment industry is huge, predicted by analysts to reach $20 billion this year. “We think this service will help expand the pie. Consumption of entertainment has gone up every year,” says Steve Pantelick, senior vice president of strategic planning at Blockbuster.

What’s more, the deal solves some of the problems of Blockbuster’s brick-and-mortar stores. For example, with an Internet-based movie-on-demand service, the store will never lose a sale because of rented or out of stock movies.


The stores will never lose a sale because all of the stores will be fricking closed in 10 years

They also limited the service to DSL customers only...
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 9:44 am
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
18804 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 9:45 am to
Every single major music company
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 9:46 am to
Napster
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29459 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 9:50 am to
quote:

smartphone market on LOCKDOWN and a decade later they barley exist


They bet on the business world continuing to favor them because they could seamlessly integrate with enterprise servers and the business environment and did nothing to embrace the media/entertainment side of the smartphone. Then Apple and Android started catering to business and enterprise systems, and RIM was completely behind the game. They chose... Poorly.
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18171 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 9:58 am to
This is a good thread. Ive learned quite a bit this morning. What else do we have?

Gateway Computers went from having cow commercials and retail stores everywhere to almost nothing. What happened there?
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18171 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:03 am to
I just remembered another one that I loved.

FranklinCovey

Made the best planners. Had a great system. Refused to move to the smartphone and it killed them.

Posted by gatorguru
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2014
333 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:03 am to
quote:

quote:
as long as you don't have a snapchat, instagram, or watch a ton of videos on your phone it gets the job done.


Not really. It still has its limitations.


elaborate....

email is and always will be fastest with BB...

There does need to be capability to decipher emojis from Iphones. It just comes across as unreadable
Posted by SECretariat
Member since Jun 2015
339 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:03 am to
The Blackberry Priv (the company's first android phone) is a good starting point for a turnaround. People still trust them for security and like their keyboards. (Personally, after using Microsoft's word flow phone keyboard, I could never return to using actual keys. Looking forward to it's arrival on android shortly.)
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17159 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Gateway Computers went from having cow commercials and retail stores everywhere to almost nothing. What happened there?


The moment I saw a Gateway computer in a Walmart, I knew they were doomed. Gateway was not well positioned in the enterprise market so when the economy sputtered in 2000-01, they lost their shirts. They bought emachines in 2004 which further gave me the impression they went "the cheap route"

Acer bought them in 2007. Gateway is still a functional business but is a shell of it's 1990's former self.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70972 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:06 am to
Obligatory Comcast answer
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63382 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:20 am to
quote:

IBM could have been bigger than Microsoft and Google had they positioned themselves better.


IBM is bigger than both Microsoft and Google, if you go off the fortune 500 list.

IBM - #23
Microsoft - #34
Google - #46

Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9055 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Blockbuster.

They had a chance to purchase Netflix for practically nothing somewhere around 25-50 million. Now there is no blockbuster and only Netflix.



Does anyone know of a good write-up or analysis on WTF Blockbuster was doing/thinking when Netflix, RedBox, etc. started coming onto the scene?

ETA: Never mind, spoke too soon.
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 10:46 am
Posted by DallasTiger
THE Capital City
Member since Jan 2004
4237 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:49 am to
Kodak
IBM
DuPont
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8028 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:00 am to
quote:

ETA: IBM


Not at all. They pivoted beautifully.

Still an F50 company after all these years even after their core mainframe business got hammered and then made obsolete.

They made a mistake in the 1980's, but they learned their lesson as well as anyone.
Posted by tigervet4
Member since Sep 2006
2343 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:02 am to
People think they aren't very big because they aren't really making hardware anymore. All of the software and consulting they do is much more profitable though.
Posted by mostbesttigerfanever
TD platinum member suite in TS
Member since Jan 2010
5016 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:06 am to
Digital Equipment Corp
quote:

In 1977, Ken Olsen, the founder and CEO of Digital Equipment Corporation, said, "There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home."


the US gov't (via the US patent office)...eta: i know this isn't a 'company'
quote:

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."
charles duell, us commissioner of patents 1898-1901
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 11:07 am
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:12 am to
quote:

FranklinCovey

Made the best planners.


They did. It's really kinda sad.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8028 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:13 am to
quote:

People think they aren't very big because they aren't really making hardware anymore. All of the software and consulting they do is much more profitable though.


Yep, exactly.

They are one of the biggest consulting firms in the world (if not the biggest).

They're much better positioned than Microsoft is now. They're essentially not even in the same business any longer.

I keep seeing Kodak on here, too - they were dumb in a lot of their structuring and marketing, but they were never going to compete with the Japanese firms in digital. They should have gone in a different direction...maybe web design or high-end filming tech or some other sort of visual arts (similar to how IBM was able to completely pivot away from their core business when it became obsolete but still in something feasible), but going digital would have been a stubborn and stupid decision.
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
24234 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Papa Murphys pizza

Let's sell lazy and fat people lazy and fat food that they have to go home and cook.


No clue what you're talking about, because they've been very successful. There's a ton of Papa Murphy's in Colorado. I have no clue why a take and bake only joint is popular, since I've never tried them. But they're making bank.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:19 am to
Well... while Kodak the film company is dying, the parent company spun off the Eastman Chemical division as its own company and it is doing well. So, in a way, they DID pivot, it's just that the more publicly recognizable film division was left to wither on the vine while the chemical division lives on. Sort of like how your average person has no idea what Oracle is because they don't make consumer products, but yet they made $38,000,000,000 last year and the owner is one of the world's 5 richest men.
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 11:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram