Started By
Message

Wind Power Production Drops Despite 6.2GW of Added Capacity

Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:55 am
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11909 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:55 am
LINK

quote:

But what happens when you build massive amounts of wind energy capacity and it doesn’t deliver — not for a day or a week, but for six months, or even an entire year? That question is germane because, on Wednesday, the Energy Information Administration published a report showing that U.S. wind energy production declined by 2.1% last year. Even more shocking: that decline occurred even though the wind sector added 6.2 GW of new capacity!


quote:

The EIA also explained that the capacity factor for America’s wind energy fleet, also known as the average utilization rate, “fell to an eight-year low of 33.5%.” That compares to 35.9% capacity factor in 2022 which was the all-time high.


Note that “capacity factor” is the percentage of actual power produced compared to the nameplate or rating. For example, nuclear and natural gas power plants can consistently operate at capacity factors over 90%.

quote:

Imagine if the U.S. had spent that same $300 billion on a weather-resilient form of generation, like, say, nuclear power. That’s relevant because Unit 4 at Plant Vogtle in Georgia came online on Monday. With that same $300 billion, the U.S. could have built 20, 30, or maybe even 40 GW of new nuclear reactors with a 92% capacity factor that wouldn’t rely on the whims of the wind.


quote:

If climate change means we will face more extreme weather in the years ahead — hotter, colder, and/or more severe temperatures for extended periods — it’s Total Bonkers CrazytownTM to make our electric grid dependent on the weather. But by lavishing staggering amounts of money on wind and solar energy, and in many cases, mandating wind and solar, that’s precisely what we are doing.
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4659 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:57 am to
Does wind ever even produce more value than what it costs to implement? Of all the renewable snakeoil it just seems like it's the oiliest.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14749 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:00 am to
Because it is all bullshite.
Posted by wileyjones
Member since May 2014
2315 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:00 am to
quote:

Of all the renewable snakeoil it just seems like it's the oiliest.
idk about oiliest but its definitely the most murderous

just ask the birds
Posted by Locoguan0
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2017
4324 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:01 am to
Take your obvious bait to the PoliBoard.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166454 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Take your obvious bait to the PoliBoard.


It’s nice to admit that the wind energy push is nothing but politics
Posted by Teufelhunden
Galvez, LA
Member since Feb 2005
5587 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:14 am to
quote:

6.2GW








Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27675 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:20 am to
Global warming. It's gotta be global warming doing it!
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27329 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Does wind ever even produce more value than what it costs to implement?


Don’t worry it is helping out someone’s bank account.
Posted by Beauregard96
Hopped up on goof balls
Member since Nov 2006
2158 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:24 am to
Who knew production would depend on something like....wind blowing a lot
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51786 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Does wind ever even produce more value than what it costs to implement?


Not since the invention of steam and petroleum fuel.



Building a large clipper, especially if you were doing it just out of wood (you know, to be more "environmentally friendly" rather than pump out all that nasty gas from smelting ore) would likely cost well into the tens of millions (the Götheborg replica was built nearly 20 years ago and cost $40M then). The load limit (~500-1k tons, I think) means it would take quite a few hauls for it to ever pay for itself.
Posted by SpotCheckBilly
Member since May 2020
6538 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:59 am to
Global Blowing blows.
Posted by Locoguan0
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2017
4324 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:01 am to
quote:

It’s nice to admit that the wind energy push is nothing but politics


Wrong answer. Posting the article was obviously political, and it was bait for confirmation-biased replies. Someone was fishing for multiple thumbs-up (the butt).
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29221 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:04 am to
So, cut off power 2/3 of the time to all the Green New Deal proponents (especially Congress) and let them enjoy their “green” energy.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29221 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:06 am to
quote:

It’s the oiliest


Idk, ethanol is almost a higher hoax bc the sheeple have bought into that hook, line and sinker.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166454 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Wrong answer. Posting the article was obviously political, and it was bait for confirmation-biased replies. Someone was fishing for multiple thumbs-up (the butt).


Wrong answer.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65852 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:13 am to
quote:

Even more shocking: that decline occurred even though the wind sector added 1.21 JW of new capacity!
FIFY, Biff
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43187 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:13 am to
quote:

ethanol is almost a higher hoax bc the sheeple have bought into that hook, line and sinker.
explain this if u dont mind.
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Wind Power Production Drops Despite 6.2GW of Added Capacity


To put this in layman's terms, this is enough power to travel in time 5 times.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79315 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Posting the article was obviously political


Wut? How does wind farm capacity have anything to do with politics? It's merely a discussion.

You sound like someone who is against St. George.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram