Started By
Message

Dad wins full custody of son, 4, after child’s mother tried to raise him non-binary

Posted on 8/1/24 at 1:59 pm
Posted by LoneStar23
USA
Member since Aug 2019
5540 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 1:59 pm
quote:

A California father said he’s been granted full custody of his 4-year-old son following a protracted legal battle with the boy’s mother — who allegedly forced the child to wear dresses and glitter because she wanted to raise him as non-binary.

Harrison Tinsley told “The Daily Signal Podcast” that he prevailed in the years-long court battle to win full physical custody of Sawyer, which the dad likened to “watching a miracle.”



new York post
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
22045 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:01 pm to
In California? There's got to be more to the story .
Posted by Slagathor
Makin' jokes about your teeny tiny
Member since Jul 2007
38273 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:02 pm to


the dad looks like a cartoon character from Arthur
Posted by jbird7
Central FL
Member since Jul 2020
5606 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:02 pm to
This is very welcoming news.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
35793 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:02 pm to
Saved that boys life.
Posted by holdmuh keystonelite
Member since Oct 2020
1476 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:02 pm to
Thank you Jesus.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
99529 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:02 pm to
The mother likely admitting she was choosing to do this instead of “the child wants this!” likely had issues on that end.


She also likely had a few screws loose mentally as well.
Posted by LoneStar23
USA
Member since Aug 2019
5540 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

She also likely had a few screws loose mentally as wel


Like when she tried to force her kid to be non binary
Posted by EnglebertHumperdink
Club Med
Member since Nov 2009
244 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

In California? There's got to be more to the story .


There is. Looks like he was denied then there was an “incident” seemingly involving drugs and CPS recommended him to have full custody. Whatever works.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
22045 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

The mother likely admitting she was choosing to do this instead of “the child wants this!” likely had issues on that end.


I read the rest of the article and...

quote:

After learning Sawyer’s mother had been arrested for felony child endangerment, Tinsley filed for full custody in San Francisco Superior Court last year, claiming that she had “slandered and defamed” him for years. The details of that arrest and incident are unclear.

The dad said he presented the court with mountains of evidence — including eight hours of police bodycam footage and over 800 pages of supporting documents — but the court sided with Sawyer’s mother, he said.

Tinsley appealed the decision last December, and claims that Child Protective Services in San Francisco became involved following an alleged “incident,” about which he declined to further elaborate.

CPS investigated and recommended Tinsley be granted full custody of the boy, and that the mother be subject to regular drug and alcohol testing, he claimed.


It was likely drugs that did her in. No way a California court gives full custody to a father because the mother forces the kid to pretend he is a girl. Yes, it is fricked up but it is true.
This post was edited on 8/1/24 at 2:07 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
99529 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:06 pm to
In addition to the obvious.


Perusing the article, she apparently had some kind of arrest for child endangerment and someone had requested she be regularly checked for drug and alcohol use.



So we have a lesbian nonbinary who mentally abuses their child by taking them to Disney and not letting them on any rides unless they wear the princess shoes she bought them subsequently getting arrested for child endangerment.



She sounds stable.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
57870 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:07 pm to
Are we sure he's really the father?


They are identical down to the way they have a gap between their upper and lower teeth.

Feel good story of the day!
Posted by ezride25
Constitutional Republic
Member since Nov 2008
24865 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:07 pm to
If I don’t even know what that is, I’m sure as shite a four year old doesn’t either.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84506 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:10 pm to
I'm glad the Dad got custody of the kid but that is a pretty misleading title.

Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
1699 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:12 pm to
Love me some good news stories.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
19217 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

The mother likely admitting she was choosing to do this instead of “the child wants this!” likely had issues on that end. She also likely had a few screws loose mentally as well.


Any person allowing their child or forcing their child to act as the opposite sex necessarily has screws loose and should be locked away in prison so they cannot procreate.
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
1699 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Tinsley alleged that Sawyer’s mother — who he said identifies as a lesbian and non-binary herself — tried to push her gender ideology onto the child from the time he was a baby.

I’m no expert, but there seems to be one big piece of evidence to the contrary here.
Posted by Patfic15
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2018
3497 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:25 pm to
Good on you, Dad.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
72016 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

The dad said he presented the court with mountains of evidence — including eight hours of police bodycam footage and over 800 pages of supporting documents — but the court sided with Sawyer’s mother, he said.

Tinsley appealed the decision last December, and claims that Child Protective Services in San Francisco became involved following an alleged “incident,” about which he declined to further elaborate.


800 pages and 8 hours of police bodycam footage, and they still side with the mother, which led to another incident that required CPS intervention.

The dad getting custody is obviously worthy of celebration, but this fight shouldn't be over.

The court defying logic and putting the child in further harm, plus wasting tax payer money by requiring additional intervention and additional appeals, should draw further scrutiny.

Should.

But won't.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111907 posts
Posted on 8/1/24 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

There is. Looks like he was denied then there was an “incident” seemingly involving drugs and CPS recommended him to have full custody. Whatever works.

Definitely whatever works for this kid, no question.

But the issue is that the root issue is not solved for other kids.

This one kid here got lucky.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram