- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jan. 6 Committee Illegally Destroyed their Records and Documents
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:39 am
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:39 am
President Trump: So now that I have full Subpoena Power because of the Freedom of Speech Sham Indictment by Crooked Joe Biden, Deranged Jack Smith, and the DOJ, it has just been reported that the Unselect January 6th Committee of Political Hacks and Thugs has illegally destroyed their Records and Documents. This is unthinkable, and the Fake Political Indictment against me must be immediately withdrawn. The system is Rigged & Corrupt, very much like the Presidential Election of 2020. We are a Nation in Decline!
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:42 am
5
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:43 am to ItzMe1972
quote:
President Trump: So now that I have full Subpoena Power
This meme needs to die before more Patriots start believing it and then, when reality sets in, they create yet another conspiracy.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:48 am to SlowFlowPro
Okay cool, what are your thoughts on the destruction or mishandling of records and documents by that committee?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:50 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
what are your thoughts on the destruction or mishandling of records and documents by that committee?
I need more information about what actually happened.
I'm not sure if there is any law relating to preservation of evidence in Congressional hearings, but if anyone has a cite, I'm willing to read it.
Then I'd take that law and compare it with real facts (which we don't have yet) to analyze the situation. If you can't do this, yet, then you can't really analyze it either.
The Jan 6 Committee will likely have little overlap with this prosecution, so it's largely irrelevant to discuss in conjunction with the prosecution.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:51 am
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I need more information about what actually happened.
I'm not sure if there is any law relating to preservation of evidence in Congressional hearings, but if anyone has a cite, I'm willing to read it.
Then I'd take that law and compare it with real facts (which we don't have yet) to analyze the situation. If you can't do this, yet, then you can't really analyze it either.
The Jan 6 Committee will likely have little overlap with this prosecution, so it's largely irrelevant to discuss in conjunction with the prosecution.
Lawyer speak for, "I don't know my arse from a hole in the ground.".
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:55 am to SlowFlowPro
The title uses the word destroyed in order to imply that the committee deliberately destroyed evidence in an attempt to hide something like exculpatory evidence.
The article reads like they didn’t save the evidence they felt like they no longer needed.
Doesn’t read like the smoking gun the OP is trying to imply.
I guess this is what desperation reads like.
Hate to see it.
The article reads like they didn’t save the evidence they felt like they no longer needed.
Doesn’t read like the smoking gun the OP is trying to imply.
I guess this is what desperation reads like.
Hate to see it.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:57 am to Clyde Tipton
quote:
Lawyer speak for, "I don't know my arse from a hole in the ground.".
No. That's a basic analysis paradigm.
You think it's better to jump to conclusions ignorantly?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I need more information about what actually happened.
I'm not sure if there is any law relating to preservation of evidence in Congressional hearings, but if anyone has a cite, I'm willing to read it.
Then I'd take that law and compare it with real facts (which we don't have yet) to analyze the situation. If you can't do this, yet, then you can't really analyze it either.
The Jan 6 Committee will likely have little overlap with this prosecution, so it's largely irrelevant to discuss in conjunction with the prosecution.
That is a lot of words to avoid saying what you know you should. There should not have been any destruction of any records when you are investigating a President of the United States. EVERYTHING should be above board and transparent. If you are not going to adhere to that standard, then your prosecution is nothing more than political hackery.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 10:08 am
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I need more information about what actually happened.
legally, you may be right. but you are willfully cherry picking one part of this to ignore the bigger picture.
in real life, assuming this is true, then this shines a light on just how crooked this system is.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:03 am to FreddieMac
quote:
That is a lot of words to avoid saying what you know you should.
quote:
. There should not have been any destruction of any records when you are investing a President of the United States.
Based on what law, exactly?
quote:
If you are not going to adhere to that standard, then your prosecution is nothing more than political hackery.
The J6 Committee didn't prosecute him.
I think they did refer him for prosecution, so they did likely send over relevant evidence for that. If the actual prosecutors have that evidence, it could be exculpatory and should not be destroyed.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:04 am to Screaming Viking
quote:
legally, you may be right. but you are willfully cherry picking one part of this to ignore the bigger picture.
in real life, assuming this is true,
The bold is why I need more information.
Team Trump and his Patriots have a history of lying about actual facts and then it's repeated until it's accepted as true.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:04 am to Screaming Viking
If Congress can destroy records that quickly then they have that ability for the sole purpose of hiding things from the American people.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:07 am to ItzMe1972
The average American sees this type of crap and doesn't care about some "legal" reason that the committee might hide behind to delete or destroy evidence. We just know its corrupt.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:10 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
The average American sees this type of crap and doesn't care about some "legal" reason that the committee might hide behind
Well that explains the Patriot push to Idiocracy.
Rational people would wait and not react, emotionally.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The J6 Committee didn't prosecute him.
All those televised committee hearing suggest otherwise.
Was it a prosecution in the court of law? No
But it was still a prosecution of a large proportion.
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Based on what law, exactly?
Do not flaunt the law if it is going to so unevenly applied as it currently is with Trump and Biden's situation.
There is the ethical, proper way to go about a process of that nature. You do it by being completely transparent and above board. If the prosecution is going to based their stupid legal theory on the finding of J6 commission, there better be all records available to the defense.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 10:13 am
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
You think, if true, destroying public records is a good thing?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:13 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
All those televised committee hearing suggest otherwise.
The fact they were in Congress and not a court is a dead giveaway.
quote:
Was it a prosecution in the court of law? No
OK so you admit it wasn't a prosecution.
quote:
But it was still a prosecution of a large proportion.
Leftist-inspired virtue signaling
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:13 am to roadGator
quote:
You think, if true, destroying public records is a good thing?
Who said that?
Posted on 8/9/23 at 10:14 am to ItzMe1972
The committee was unconstitutional to begin with.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News