- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ST. George WINS Incorporation is a reality!
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:58 pm to teke184
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:58 pm to teke184
quote:
Be fair. She is part of a side that believes declaring yourself a woman means you are a woman even if you still have a cock.
Link? So sick of you losers spouting whatever lies come to your tiny brains just because you’re pouting because a woman has the audacity to disagree with a bunch of middle aged and older men on the internet.
0
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:03 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
Once again, You Are Wrong
Dang, I had no idea this school district was formed in 2022. How many students does this school district serve? How many schools does it oversee? Why has it been kept a secret for two years?
Why did you misquote the link you posted? That law pertains to the Central Community school system and its from 2007.
This post was edited on 4/27/24 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:19 pm to 4cubbies
2022 is the edition of the state law update this citation was taken from dumbass. and the funding mechanism was not approved because it requires a ? vote, (when Broome et al when in the Senate told us to form a city to get the school). If you had actually read the citation you would have seen the part that says,
well that will be fixed soon
Take the L dumbass, you're only embarassing yourself with every response.
quote:
notwithstanding any provision of law or rule or regulation to the contrary
well that will be fixed soon
Take the L dumbass, you're only embarassing yourself with every response.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:29 pm to cssamerican
quote:
EBR got stuck with the legacy costs of Baker, Zachary, and Central. They are still funding those costs by the way.
Baker was incorporated in 1944
Zachary was incorporated in 1899
Posted on 4/28/24 at 12:00 am to doubleb
quote:
Baker was incorporated in 1944 Zachary was incorporated in 1899
That was referring the school system, not the city government.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 5:48 am to tommy2tone1999
quote:
2022 is the edition of the state law update this citation was taken from dumbas
Calling ME a dumbass when you literally lied in your post by changing the words in your “quote” to fit your fantasy.
Fake news. Downvote away. We hate when women are right around here. How dare someone with a vagina correct an old white man!
quote:
Take the L dumbass, you're only embarassing yourself with every response.
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 5:54 am
Posted on 4/28/24 at 6:11 am to tommy2tone1999
So from what I can best gleen, we are waiting for the rehearing delays to run, then the Gov. will appoint a Mayor and set elections.
Then there will be elections for Council & Mayor.
It will be these people who take on the City of Baton Rouge for St. George and negotiate the $$ and what happens.
We need some good people.
Then there will be elections for Council & Mayor.
It will be these people who take on the City of Baton Rouge for St. George and negotiate the $$ and what happens.
We need some good people.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:19 am to tommy2tone1999
Build the pearly gates!
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:25 am to GoldenGuy
Can 70808 get annexed into St George?
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:52 am to tommy2tone1999
quote:quote:
Serious question: what happens to the areas the SWB annexed into the city of Baton Rouge after the vote took place?
Null and void This includes Lipsey's, United Plaza
The Advocate had a different take:
Several businesses and organizations, including the LSU campus, the Mall of Louisiana and L’Auberge Casino have already been annexed into Baton Rouge so as not to be included in the new city of St. George.
I'm not trying to poke, I'm genuinely interested in the answer to this question.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:55 am to Red Stick Rambler
quote:
Several businesses and organizations, including the LSU campus, the Mall of Louisiana and L’Auberge Casino have already been annexed into Baton Rouge so as not to be included in the new city of St. George.
These sought annexation (at MOPs urging) in the three years between the "failure" of the first vote and the filing of the new incorporation petition. Any annexation since the filing of the petition (and the setting of the boundaries of the proposed city) are, by law, null.
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 8:36 am
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:55 am to Red Stick Rambler
I've read that any annexations that occurred after November 2019 are null and void. This will likely have to be litigated.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:04 am to SirWinston
quote:
LOL at LSURussian
Always been a smug twat
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:13 am to 4cubbies
quote:
It doesn’t make sense that a parish would have to “turn over” or surrender its assets to a new city that formed after the assets were established. Seems like EBR could lease or sell the buildings to St. George similarly to how the Archdiocese and NOLA-PS leases and sells its buildings to charter schools.
As I understand it, the new district will have to purchase the assets.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:15 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Isn’t this EXACTLY why St. George was formed? To remove itself from Baton Rouge?
No. St George has never been a part of Baton Rouge.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:17 am to tommy2tone1999
Lakeview next?
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:19 am to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Lakeview next?
I believe that’s a whole different situation because Lakeview is part of the City of New Orleans.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:33 am to Indefatigable
quote:
As I understand it, the new district will have to purchase the assets.
Which doesn't make sense really. The taxpayers paid for those assets. The taxpayers have lost nothing by those assets being transferred to another government to be used for the same, identical purpose they were being used for previously.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:34 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
The taxpayers paid for those assets.
Across the whole parish, yea.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 8:41 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Across the whole parish, yea.
Changes nothing. They are going to be used for the same purpose they are used for now.
Page 13 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News