- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The First Amendment is being burned to the ground
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:47 am to FredBear
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:47 am to FredBear
quote:But it does mean freedom of speech, which you will no longer have in the same capacity as you do now one this bill passes.
Freedom of speech doesn't mean beating up and tasering people because of their heritage or religious orientation or holding institutions hostage to where they can not conduct their daily business.
But this board loves them some republican politicians, so I'm sure they'll explain why that's ok and we should be ok giving up those freedoms and not be allowed to criticize other governments, whether you agree with the criticism or not.
0
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:47 am to Frank Belavis
Hilarious how burning, looting, and assault was “free speech” in 2020 and now trespassing, breaking and entering, assault, and property destruction is again “free speech”.
I thought you guys called breaking into buildings “attempted murder”?? What happened to that??
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:47 am to Damone
You idiots don’t understand the first amendment
Free speech doesn’t equal freedom from consequences. A private company like the university of Texas doesn’t have an obligation to tolerate your inflammatory rhetoric. It’s not like the Congress is legislating this stuff.
Free speech doesn’t equal freedom from consequences. A private company like the university of Texas doesn’t have an obligation to tolerate your inflammatory rhetoric. It’s not like the Congress is legislating this stuff.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:48 am to CleverUserName
quote:It's hilarious how behind you are in this discussion while thinking you know all about it.
Hilarious how burning, looting, and assault was “free speech” in 2020 and now trespassing, breaking and entering, assault, and property destruction is again “free speech”.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:49 am to shel311
quote:
He's probably referring to the rushed bill that passed that both democrats and Republicans voted for that make criticizing the Israel government illegal.
Correct.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:49 am to OBReb6
quote:Another one, more than happy to give away his freedom of speech to criticize other governments, just because republican politicians voted for the bill and are literally anti freedom.
You idiots don’t understand the first amendment
Free speech doesn’t equal freedom from consequences. A private company like the university of Texas doesn’t have an obligation to tolerate your inflammatory rhetoric. It’s not like the Congress is legislating this stuff.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:51 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
Post less.
My apologies for having a life outside of the internet, unlike Ag Zwin.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:51 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:How stupid is Mike Johnson? The bill would make parts of the Bible illegal. That's how stupid Mike Johnson is.
Bunk Moreland
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:52 am to shel311
Damn right. I think we should add an amendment to the constitution that is an oath Israel
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:52 am to Frank Belavis
quote:
The First Amendment is being burned to the ground
Let's be specific.
Should someone be able to say out loud that they hate Jews and think it would be a good idea to rid them from this world.
Yes. The First Amendment protects that speech.
Should someone be able to protest, block access, takeover and demand things from universities, threaten Jews, assault Jews?
No. Those people should be punished harshly.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:53 am to OBReb6
I appreciate what you’re doing here
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:54 am to Frank Belavis
I fail to see a problem with the first amendment in all of this, but I do see the fingerprints of Marxism, especially in the organized and divisional zeal behind getting these professional protesters to act so quickly. That’s all I see, and all I have seen with these relentless divisional protests over everything under the sun over the past five or ten years or so. Just a bunch of Marxist robots given their marching orders.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:54 am to shel311
quote:
It's hilarious how behind you are in this discussion while thinking you know all about it.
Want to actually make a coherent retort instead of programmed drivel??
And bonus question… are you going to wear your hijab and pray to Allah right up until you pick up your pride flag for June?? Or are you going to take a week in between??
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:54 am to Frank Belavis
Where in the 1st amendment does it say you have the right to violently occupy?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:54 am to St Augustine
quote:Leftist violence is speech. Conservative speech is violence.
I wasn’t aware that breaking into buildings, attacking targeted individuals, and overtaking land was part of the first amendment. Seems like at any point in our history such aggression would be met with force.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:54 am to Frank Belavis
Breaking up illegal protests = buning the first amendment?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:55 am to VOR
quote:
the pro-Palestine protests. They’re fine as long as they’re not a threat
Every long term pro-Palestine protest will eventually turn to violence.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:55 am to Mike da Tigah
Careful. Criticizing marxism is antisimetic.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:55 am to moneyg
moneyg is dropping a little reason into the discussion.??
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News